Document Type: Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Professor of Occupational Health, Research Center for Health Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

3 Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Background: Evidence shows that job stress potentially has adverse effect on individuals’ health and organizational productivity. It has, therefore, become an important issue in the occupational health context. The aims of this study were to investigate job stress dimensions among nurses of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) hospitals and comparing the results with the findings of the previous studies conducted in other countries. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 385 randomly selected nurses of SUMS participated. The Persian version of Job Content Questionnaire (P-JCQ) and demographic questionnaire were used for data collection. The linguistic validity and psychometric properties of P-JCQ have been assessed and approved in a previous study. One sample t-test was used to examine the differences between means of job stress dimension scores of the present and those of the previous studies carried out in other countries. Results: The means (SD) of decision latitude, psychological job demands, social support, physical job demands and job insecurity were found to be 58.15 (6.50), 38.19 (5.14), 22.67 (3.67), 16.03 (2.58), and 7.74 (3.85), respectively. The results revealed that decision latitude and social support dimensions were in a low level among the study subjects. In contrast, psychological job demand, physical job demand, and job insecurity dimensions were shown to be in a high level. Conclusion: The SUMS hospital environment collectively imposes higher job stress on the nurses as compared to that of other countries. To prevent harmful effects of job stress on the nurses’ health and job performance, developing macro-ergonomic strategies in this working environment, such as enhancing job control, reducing job demands, and providing supportive climate, seem necessary.

Keywords

  1. Li J, Yang W, Liu P, Xu Z, Cho SI. Psychometric
  2. evaluation of the Chinese (mainland) version of Job
  3. Content Questionnaire: a study in university hospitals.
  4. Ind Health 2004; 42(2): 260-7.
  5. LaDou J. Occupational & environmental medicine. 2nd
  6. ed. New York, Stamford: Prentice-Hall International;
  7. McGraw-Hill, 1997. p. 585-601.
  8. Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL, Sokas RK.
  9. Occupational and environmental health: recognizing
  10. and preventing disease and injury. 5th ed. Philadelphia,
  11. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006. p. 382-395.
  12. Stellman JM. Encyclopedia of occupational health and
  13. safety. 4th ed. Geneva, International Labor Office,
  14. p. 34.2-34.28.
  15. Karasek RA, Theörell T. Healthy work-stress,
  16. productivity, and the reconstruction of working life.
  17. New York, Basic Book, 1990.
  18. Magnago TSBS, Lisboa MTL, Griep RH, Kirchhof
  19. ALC, Guido LA. Psychosocial aspects of work and
  20. musculoskeletal disorders in nursing workers. Rev
  21. Latino-Am Enfermagem 2010; 18(3): 429-35.
  22. Josephson M, Lagerström M, Hagberg M, Wigaeus
  23. Hjelm E. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain
  24. among nursing personnel: a study over a three year
  25. period. Ocup Environ Med 1997; 54(9): 681-5.
  26. Menzel NN. Psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal
  27. disorders. Crit Care Nurs Clin Am 2007; 19(2): 145-53.
  28. Chiu YL, Chung RG, Wu CS, Ho CH. The effects of
  29. job demands, control, and social support on hospital
  30. clinical nurses’ intention to turn over. Appl Nursing
  31. Res 2009; 22(4): 258-63.
  32. Kain J, Jex S. Karasek’s (1979) Job Demands-
  33. Control Model: a summary of current issues and
  34. recommendations for future research. In: Perrewe
  35. PL, Ganster DC. New developments in theoretical
  36. and conceptual approaches to job stress. UK, Emerald
  37. Group Publishing Limited, 2010, p. 237-67.
  38. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I,
  39. Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire
  40. (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative
  41. assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J
  42. Occup Health Psychol 1998; 3(4): 322-55.
  43. Hanse JJ, Forsman M. Identification and analysis
  44. of unsatisfactory psychosocial work situations: a
  45. participatory approach employing video-computer
  46. interaction. Appl Ergon 2001; 32(1): 23-9.
  47. Nomura K, Nakao M, Takeuchi T, Yano E. Associations
  48. of insomnia with job strain, control, and support among
  49. male Japanese workers. Sleep Med 2009; 10(6): 626-9.
  50. Hansen AM, Hogh A, Persson R, Karlson B, Garde
  51. AH, Ørbaek P. Bullying at work, health outcomes,
  52. and physiological stress response. J Psychosomatic
  53. Res 2006; 60(1): 63-72.
  54. Sinokki M, Hinkka K, Ahola K, Koskinen S, Kivimäki
  55. M, Honkonen T, et al. The association of social support
  56. at work and in private life with mental health and
  57. antidepressant use: t he health 2000 study. J A ffect
  58. Disord 2009; 115(1-2): 36-45.
  59. Barzideh M, Choobineh AR, Tabatabaee SHR. Job stress
  60. dimensions and their relationship to musculoskeletal
  61. disorders in Iranian nurses. Work 2014; 47(4): 423-9.
  62. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki,
  63. Finland, June 1964, and amended by the 59th
  64. WMA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, October
  65. Available from http://www.wma.net/ en/30publications/10policies/b3/ (Accessed December
  66. , 2011).
  67. Karasek RA. Job Content Questionnaire and user’s
  68. guide. Lowell, Massachusetts, Department of Work
  69. Environment, University of Massachusetts, 1985.
  70. Choobineh AR, Ghaem H, Ahmadinejad P. Validity
  71. and reliability of the Persian (Farsi) version of the Job
  72. Content Questionnaire: a study among hospital nurses.
  73. EMHJ 2011; 17(4): 335-41.
  74. Morgan DG, Semchuk KM, Stewart NJ, D’Arcy C.
  75. Job strain among staff of rural nursing homes. A
  76. comparison of nurses, aides, and activity workers.
  77. JONA 2002; 32(3): 152-61.
  78. Tominaga MT, Miki A. A longitudinal study of factors
  79. associated with intentions to leave among newly
  80. graduated nurses in eight advanced treatment hospitals
  81. in Japan. Ind Health 2010; 48(3): 305-16.
  82. Eum KD, Li J, Jhun HJ, Park JT, Tak SW, Karasek R,
  83. et al. Psychometric properties of the Korean version
  84. of the Job Content Questionnaire: data from health
  85. care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007;
  86. (6): 497-504.
  87. Shen HC, Cheng Y, Tsai PJ, Lee SH, Guo YL.
  88. Occupational stress in nurses in psychiatric institutions
  89. in Taiwan. J Occup Health 2005; 47(3): 218-25.
  90. Ortiz VG. Assessment of psychosocial stressors at work:
  91. psychometric properties of the JCQ in Colombian workers.
  92. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia 2011; 43: 329-42.
  93. Ibrahim S, Smith P, Muntaner C. A multi-group crosslagged
  94. analyses of work stressors and health using
  95. Canadian national sample. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68(1):
  96. -59.