A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Awareness of Pesticide Labels and Pesticide Safety Pictograms among Paddy Farming In South India

vijay kautilya, shruti Prabhat Hegde, Prithika Chendrashekaran, Khatija begum

Abstract


Abstract
Background: Hazardous pesticides continue to be used in the
farming industry purely because of economic reasons. Farmers
need to understand this risk. Pesticide labels and pictograms were
enforced to propagate this risk information to the farmers in a
simple way. However, their effectiveness has not been evaluated in
India. This study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of these labels
and pictograms to help farmers understand the pesticide risks.
Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was
conducted among 172 paddy farmers in Kancheepuram district
of Tamil-Nadu, India. Their interpretation of four pesticide
labels and fifteen pesticide safety pictograms were analyzed
using (SPSS version 20) for descriptive statistics. Chi-square
test was used for dichotomic variables. A p value of < 0.05 was
considered significant.
Results: Of the 172 farmers interviewed, 93% were unaware
of the pesticide regulations and 72.6% had never attempted to
read the labels. Only, the red color in the label was identified
correctly by 66.1% of farmers. Four out of fifteen pictograms
were interpreted correctly by more than 60% of the farmers.
Educational status had a significant influence on the way the
labels and pictograms were interpreted.
Conclusion: We need to consider restructuring these labels in
a more scientific way. Instead of a top-down approach, we need
to start working at the grass root level if we tend to have better
appreciated labels. It is recommended that plans and strategies
should be devised to educate the farmers about the labels and
pictograms.


Keywords


Pictograms, Pesticide Labels, farmer's interpretation, educational status.

Full Text:

Remote Remote PDF

References


References: -

GDP- Composition by sector of origin. The World Factbook. Central intelligence agency. Retrieved 28 April 2016.Available from Url: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the­world­factbook/fields/2012.html.

Abhilash PC, Singh N. Pesticide use and application: An Indian scenario. Journal of Hazardous Materials.2009; 165: p1–12.

Mohit Gupta. Pesticide Poisoning in India. Occupational health and safety. Asian Labour Update. March 2010; p32-35.

Insecticides Rules. Central Insecticides Board. 1971; Available from Url: http://cibrc.nic.in/insecticides_rules.htm

Rother HA, London L. Classification and labelling of chemicals: new Globally Harmonized System (GHS). Encyclopedia Pest Manage. 2008; 1 (1): p1–6.

Rother HA. South African farm workers’ interpretation of risk assessment data expressed as pictograms on pesticide labels. Environmental Research. 2008; 108: p 419–427.

Waichman AV, Eve E, Nina NCS. Do farmers understand the information displayed on pesticide product labels? A key question to reduce pesticides exposure and risk of poisoning in the Brazilian Amazon. Crop Protection . 2007; 26: p 576–583.

Damlas CA, Khan M. Farmers’ attitudes towards pesticide labels: implications for personal and environmental safety. Int j of pest management. 2016; Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2016.1195027.

Hasing T, Carpio CE, Wills DB, Sydorovych O, Marra M. The Effect of Label Information on Farmers’ Pesticide Choice . Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, July 25-27, 2010. Available from:

Wilkinson RL, Cary JW, Barr NF, Reynolds J. Comprehension of pesticide safety information : effects of pictorial and textual warnings. Int j of pest management. 1997; 43(3): p239- 245.

Deputy Director of Statistics . District Statistical Hand Book 2013-2014. Kancheepuram Dist. 2015; Available from:

Vari,A. The Mental Models Approach to Risk Research–An RWM Perspective Secretariat Paper. NEA/RWM/FSC(2003)7/REV1. 2004; Unclassified. France : Nuclear Energy Agency. Available from URL: http://www.nea.fr/html/rwm/docs/2004/ rwm-fsc2004-7-rev1.pdfS.

Mayhorn CB, Wogalter MS, Bell JL. Homeland security safety symbols: are we ready? Ergon. Des. Fall. 2004; p6–14

Edworthy J, Hellier E, Morley N, Grey C, Aldrich K, Lee A. Linguistic and location effects in compliance with pesticide warning labels for amateur and professional users. Hum. Factors. 2004; 46 (1): p11–31.

Silver NC, Braun CC. Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles. Safety Sci. 1995; 16: p615-625.

Braun CC, Kline PB, Silver NC. The influence of color on warning label perceptions. Int J Ind Ergon. 1995; 15: p179-187.

Van Der Hoek W, Konradsen F, Athukorala K, Wanigadew T. Pesticide poisoning: a major health problem in Sri Lanka. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998; 46 (4): p495–504.

Salameh PR., Baldi I, Brochard P, Saleh BA. Pesticide in Lebanon: a knowledge, attitude and practice study. Environ. Res.2004; 94: p1–6.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

pISSN: 2345-2218          eISSN: 2345-3893