Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Grounded Theory Approach in Discovering the Factors Effective on the Sexual Communication of Iranian Couples

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Counseling and Education Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.30476/jhsss.2022.96157.1640

Abstract

Background: The quality and manner of couples’ communication in sexual matters is one of the most important and effective variables on the couples’ sexual health and satisfaction. The aim of this study was to discover the factors affecting the couples’ sexual communication from the perspective of couples’ therapists, couples, and research.
Methods: The present study was conducted qualitatively using the grounded theory method that has three statistical population. In the research section, electronic resources, books, dissertations, and valid journals were used. In interviewing all the Iranian couple therapists and interviewing all couples who were referred to counseling centers in Mashhad, purposeful sampling was used. Data were collected using semi-structured and interactive interviews. For the validity of the data, after saturation, 2 more people were added, and the interview continued. Finally, 13 couple therapists and 21 couples were interviewed. MAXQDA20 software was used for data analysis.
Results: In the text analysis of the interviews with couple therapists, in open coding 62 categories and in axial coding 14 categories; in interviews with couples, in open coding 56 categories and in axial coding 14 categories; and in qualitative analysis of research, in open coding 42 categories and in axial coding 13 categories were obtained. Finally, with the use of triangulation, three main categories of couple, individual, and situation were identified.
Conclusion: According to the results obtained, couple therapists are advised to have a combination of multidimensional attitudes towards the couples’ sexual communication and pay attention to it in therapeutic and educational sessions.

Highlights

Javad Vakili (Google Scholar)

Seyed Ali Kimiaei (Google Scholar)

Keywords

References
  1. Jones A, Robinson D, Seedall R. The Role of Sexual Communication in Couples sexual outcome: A Dyadic path analysis. J JMFT.2017; 4(4). 606-623. doi: 101111/jmft.1. PMID: 29044661.
  2. Ledbetter A. Family Communication Patterns and Relational Maintenance Behavior: Direct and Mediated Associations with Friendship Closeness.Hum. Commun. Res.2009; 35(1)130-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1468.22958.2008.01341x.
  3. Newstrom N. Sexual Communication: An Exploration of How Couples Communicate and Consent to Sexual Behaviors, a dissertation submitted to the faculty of university of Minnesota.2018. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/194563.
  4. Metz E, McCarthy W. The “Good-Enough Sex” model for couple sexual satisfaction.sex. Relatsh.Ther.2007; 22, 351–362. doi:10.1080/14681990601
  5. Rehman US, Rellini AH, Fallis E. The importance of sexual self-disclosure to sexual satisfaction and functioning in committed relationships. J Sex Med.2011;8, 3108–3115. doi:10.111/J.1743-6109.2011.02439x. PMID: 21883943.
  6. Alan, M. The Influence of Family Communication Patterns on Sexual Communication in Romantic Relationships: A Dyadic Analysis, A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment  of the Requirements for the Degree   Doctor of Philosophy, Arizona State University.2016.
  7. Rehman U, Balan D, Sutherland s, Neil J. Understanding barriers to sexual communication. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2018; 1–20. doi: 10.1177/0265407518794900.Corp. UsID: 150139648.
  8. Rehman US, Lizdek I, Fallis E, Sutherland S, Goodnight j A. How Is Sexual Communication Different from Nonsexual Communication? A Moment-by-Moment Anal Ysis of Discussions between Romantic Partners. Sex.Behav. 2017. doi:10.1007//s10508-017-1006-5. PMID: 28681190.
  9. Kim JL, Ward L.M. Silence speaks volumes: Parental sexual communication among Asian American emerging adults.J. Adolesc. Res.2007; 22, 3–31. doi:10.1177/074355840629491.
  10. Metts S, Spitzberg B. sexual communication in Interpersonal Contexts: A Script-Based Approach. Int. Commun. Assoc. 2016, 19(1)49-92. doi:10.1080/2380/23808985.1996.11678928.
  11. Roels R, Janssen E. Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Young, Heterosexual Couples: The Role of Sexual Frequency and Sexual Communication. J Sex med.2020; 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.013. PMID: 32694066.
  12. Santos-Iglesias P, Byers E. Development and initial validation of the verbal and nonverbal sexual communication questionnaire in Canada and Spain.sex.Relatsh. ther.2018; 35(1):1. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2018.1442569.
  13. Rancourt K, Rosen N, Bergeron S. Nealis Talking About Sex When Sex Is Painful: Dyadic Sexual Communication Is Associated with Women's Pain, and Couples' Sexual and Psychological Outcomes in Provoked Vestibulodynia. Sex Behav.2016;45(8):1933-1944. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0670-6. PMID: 26739823.
  14. Yurkiw J. Links Between Depressive Symptoms, Sexual Communication, and Sexual Satisfaction Across Three Years. A thesis submitted in partial Fulfillment of  the requirements for the degree of master of science in family Ecology and partic.2021. doi: 10.7939/r3-7cpb-6b79.
  15. Harrisa H, Monahan, j, Hovickc S. Communicating new sexual desires and the factors that influence message directness. sex.Relatsh. ther.2014; 29(4)405423. doi:10.80/14681994.2014.954992.
  16. Bennet M. Talk Dirty to Me: An Examination of the Effects of Communication during Sexual Activity on Relational Outcomes for Young Adults Beginning Romantic Relationships. (A Dissertation submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut).2019.
  17. Hess A. Coffelt, T. Verbal communication about sex in marriage: Patterns of language use and its connection with relational outcomes. J.Sex Res.2012; 49, 603–612. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.619282. PMID: 22004117.
  18. Vannier S, O'Sullivan, L. Communicating Interest in Sex: Verbal and Nonverbal Initiation of Sexual Activity in Young Adults' Romantic Dating Arch. Sex.Behav.2011 ;40(5): 961-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010=9663-7. PMID: 20809374.
  19. Onipede, w, Uche, I. Understanding Sexual Negotiation between Marital Partners: A Study of the Ogu Families in Southwestern Nigeria. African Population Studie.African Population Studies (journals.ac.za).2010; 23(2). doi:11564/23-2-318.
  20. Fox K, Ashley A, Ritter L, Martin T, Knox D. Gender Differences in Sex Secret Disclosure to a Romantic Partner. Sexualit & Culture: 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09880-3. Corpus ID: 236360398.
  21. Bay F. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Attachment -Cognitive Processing Integrative Marital Therapy with Cognitive – Behavioral Marital Therapy on Sexual Psychological Processes, Female Sexual Function and Their Husband’s Sexual Satisfaction in Isfehan. University of Isfahan Faculty of Educational Science & Psychology Department of Consoling Ph.D. Thesis; 2013.
  22. Babin E A. An examination of predictors of nonverbal and verbal communication of pleasure during sex and sexual satisfaction.JSPR.2013;30(3).270-292. doi:10.1177/0265407512454523.
  23. Delaney A. A Relational Turbulence Model of Sexual Communication in Couples with Depression. Commun.Res.2021; 1–25. doi: 10.1177/009365022095822.
  24. McNeil J, Rehman, US, Fallis The influence of attachment styles on sexual communication behavior.JSR.2017. doi:10.10/00224499.2017.1318817. PMID: 28509583.
  25. Wu T, Zheng Y. Effect of Sexual Esteem and Sexual Communication on the Relationship between Body Image and Sexual Function in Chinese Heterosexul Women.JSM. 2021; 18(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.12.006. PMID: 33487573.
  26. Hassni sadi, B, Haghighatian M and Jahan Bakhsh E. Analyzing the contexts and strategies of Male users in the cyberspace for finding spouse in Kerman city. J. Appl. Sociol.2021; 31(4)117-138. doi: 10.22108/jas.2020.118841.1770.
  27. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.2006.
  28. Mallory A. Family sexual communication and sexual attitudes: understanding the influence on couple sexual communication. A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of science department of Studies and Human Services College of Human Ecology Kansas State university Manhattan, Kansas saacs.2012.
  29. Warren, C. Family Sex Communication Quotient Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures (4th ed.) (pp.248-250). Publisher: New York: Routledge;2020.
  30. Isaacs M. Let’s talk about sex: how family communication patterns and family sexual communication impact adolescents’ and emerging adults’ sexual outcomes. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital conservancy.2012;https://hdl.handle.net/11299/1372. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/137205.
  31. Booth‐Butterfield, M. Sidelinger R. The influence of family communication on the college‐aged child: Openness, attitudes and actions about sex and alcohol. Commun. Q.2009; 46(3)295308. doi: 10.1080/01463379809370103.
  32. Powers J. The Influence of Parental Communication About Sexual Health on Quality of Emerging Adult Romantic Relationships. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School, University of Southern Mississippi; 2017.
  33. Ping S. The Effects of Psychological Schema in Communication Behaviors. Sino-US English Teaching.2016; 13(5)401-403. doi: 10.17265/1539-8072/2016.05.010.
  34. Vllanueva Ch. How attachment, personality, and sexual self-schema influence sexual behavior. A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of Psychology California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS in Psychology (Counseling Psychology);2012.
  35. Radlove s. Sexual response and gender roles. In ER. Allgeier &McCormick (Eds). Changing boundaries, Gender roles & sexual behavior: 292; 2006.
  36. Morley L. What Women Want: A Study of Communication, Sex and Personality. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Psychology in the College of Sciences and the Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida;2018.Honors Undergraduate Theses. 346. https://stars.Library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/346.
  37. McNeil J. Attachment and Sexual Communication behavior (A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology);2017.
  38. Franckowiak Intimacy after Sexual Trauma: Clinical Perspectives. Retrieved from Sophia, the St.  Catherine university repository website:ttps://Sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/734;2017.
  39. Lukacena K, &Mark, K. Communicating a History of Sexual Trauma: Partner Responses to Women's Disclosure. Violence Against Women.2021;1- 19. doi:10.1177/1077801221103. PMID: 34668448.
  40. Vinti H, Jozkowski K, Hunt M. Show or Tell? Does Verbal and/or Nonverbal Sexual Communication Matter for sexual satisfacation? J. Sex Marital. The .2019; 45(3):1-30. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1501446. PMID: 30040593.
  41. Abbasi M, Bagiyan M, Dargahi S, Ghamari G H. Effectiveness of Behavioral communicati-on Couple Therapy on Marital Adjustment and sexual Intimacy.Irian. J. Nurse.2015:28(95), 22-33. url:http://ojn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2190-fa.html.
  42. Fallah M, SaeiGhareM, Ozgoli G, Mehrabi G, Mehrabi Y, Farnam F, Bakhtyari Correlation of Women’ S Marital and Sexual Satisfaction in Different Family Life Cycle Stages in Khorram Abad, Iran. International Journal of women’s health and reproduction sciences October.2018;6(4)432-437. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.72.
  43. Huong B. ‘Let's talk about sex, baby: sexual communication in marriage in contemporary Vietnam. Culture, Health&Sexuality. 2010; 12(51) S19S29. doi:10.1080/1369105090307. PMID: 19637069.
  44. Attaky A, Kok G, Dewitte. Attachment Insecurity and Sexual and Relational Experiences in Saudi Arabian Women: The Role of Perceived Partner Responsiveness and sexual Assertiveneness.J. Sex. Med.2020; 17(7), 1383-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.029. PMID: 32278475.
  45. Ke M, No R. Perceived partner responsive-ness moderate the associations between sexual talk and sexual and relationship well-being in Long term couple. J. sex.res. 2020; 57(3): 351-364. doi: 10.1080/00224499.22019.1610151. PMID: 31090449.
  46. Lankveld J, Jacobs N, Thewissen V, Dewitte M, Verbo P. The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life. J Soc Pers Relat.2018; 35(4): 557–576. doi:10.1177/0265407517743. PMID: 29899585.
  47. Birnbaum G, Mizrahi M, Maymon Y, Sass O, Milner Ch. Intimately connected: The Importance of partner Responsiveness for Experiencing sexual desire pers Soc Psychol.2016;111(4):530-46. doi: 10.1037/pspi 0000069. PMID: 27399250.
  48. Lee H, Kerri K. Does Sexual Communication Promote Partner Relationship among Older Adults? A cross-Cultural Analysis.Int. J. Dev. Sci..2019;13(1) 67-75.
  49. Kurdbache Sh, Arefi M. The Role of Family Communication Patterns and Sexual Quality in Predicting Attitudes Toward Marital Infidelity in Women in Isfahan. J. Health Soc. Behav commun Health.2018:2(1):199-209.
  50. Weiser D, Weigel D. Testing a Model of Communication Responses to Relationship Infidelity. Commun.Q:2014; 62(4).416-435. doi: 10.1080/014373.2014.922482.
  51. Tanga N, Bensmana L, Hatfield E. Culture and Sexual Self-Disclosure in Intimate Relationships.nterpersona.Psych.eu. 2013. 7(2) 227–245. doi: 10.5964/ijpr. v7i2.141.
  52. Bhavsar V, Bhugra D. Cultural factors and sexual dysfunction in clinical practice. Psychiatr. Treat.2013; 19,144-152. doi:10.1192/ apt.bp.111.009852.
  53. Schmit B. Sexual communication among intercultural couples with a Finnish partner. Master’s Thesis Intercultural Communication Department of Communication. 2016, universit y of Jyvaskyla.
  54. Butler S. "Teaching communication in sex education: Facilitating communication skills knowledge and ease of use". College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and dissertations.90. http://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/90;2011.
  55. Rancurt M, Flyn M, Bergeron S, Rosen N. It Take Two: sexual communication pattern and the sexual and Relational adjustment of coping with provoked vestibule odynia. J Sex med.2017; 14(3):434-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.009. PMID: 28189562.
  56. Simpson W, Ramberg JA. The Influence of Religion on Sexuality: Implications for Sex Therapy.Religion & Sex, Health.1992; 56(4):511-23. PMID: 1422526.
  57. Jayne A. The Relationship of Religious Emphasis During Childhood, Religious Values, and Family Conversations with Sex Anxiety. Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy;2019.
  58. Kohut T, Fisher WA, Campbell L. Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Sex. Behav.2017; 46, 585–602. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0783-6. PMID: 27393037.
  59. Kohut, T. Balzarin, R, wiliam A., &Campbell L. Pornography’s associations with open sexual communication and relationship closeness vary as a function of dyadic patterns of pornography use within heterosexual relationships. Soc. Pers. Relatsh.2018; 35(4): 655-675. doi: 10.1177/0265407517743096.
  60. Kiruhi M, A Study of Factors Influencing Sexual Communication Between Young Married Couples of Ong’Ata    Town, Kajiado County, Keneva (A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the award of doctor of philosophy in communicatio -n and information studies at the University of Nairobi, school of journalism and mass communication; 2018.

 

Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System
Volume 12, Issue 2
April 2024
Pages 156-166
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics