Document Type: Original Articles
Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of
Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;
Research Center for Health Sciences,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,
Department of Epidemiology, School
of Health, Shiraz University of Medical
Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;
Background: Manual load lifting is the most common and stressful activity that imposes high biomechanical pressures on the body, particularly on the back. Diverse studies have shown that load lifting can cause work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers. This study was conducted to assess manual lifting activity using NIOSH equation and WISHA index and compare the results of the two methods in workers with manual lifting activities.Methods: This cross- sectional study was carried out among 120 workers with manual lifting activity in 7 industrial settings of Shiraz city. Nordic Musculoskeletal disorders Questionnaire (NMQ) and demographic questionnaire, as well as NIOSH lifting equation and WISHA index were used to gather the required data. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, 19.Results: The results showed that back problems were the most frequent musculoskeletal disorders among the workers studied (68.3%). The results of lifting evaluation indicated that 79.2% of the individuals in the NIOSH method and 39.2% in WISHA index were at risk of back injuries. The kappa value was equal to 0.29, indicating a fair agreement between the results of assessment by the two methods.Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed a fair correlation between these two assessment methods, so they might be used interchangeably.
- Faghih MA, Motamedzade M, Mohammadi H, Habibi
- MM, Bayat H, Arassi M, et al. Manual Material
- Handling Assessment by Snook tables in Hamadan
- casting workshops. Iran Occupational Health 2013;
- (1): 60-7. [persian]
- Sadeghi Naeini H. The principles of Ergonomics in
- Materials Handling Systems. Publications Asana ed.
- Tehran: asana; 2000. p. 43. [persian]
- Motamedzade M, Dormohammadi A, Amjad Sardrodi
- H, Zarei E, Dormohammadi R. The role of ergonomic
- design and application of NIOSH method in improving
- the safety of load lifting tasks. Arak Medical University
- Journal 2013; 16(75): 90-100. [persian]
- Lin CJ, Wang SJ, Chen HJ. A field evaluation method
- for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress
- in manual lifting tasks. Industrial health 2006; 44(4):
- Straker L. A critical appraisal of manual handling
- risk assessment literature: International Ergonomics
- Association Press; 1997.
- Mohammadian MM, Motamedzade M, Faradmal J.
- investigating the correlations of OCRA index, strain
- index and ACGIH HAL methods for assessing the
- risk of upper limb muskoloskeletal disorders. Journal
- of Ergonomics 2013; 1(2): 63-71. [persian]
- Moussa MM. Review on health effects related to
- mobile phones Part II: results and conclusions. The 1.
- Kulin J, Reaston M. Musculoskeletal disorders early
- diagnosis: A retrospective study in the occupational medicine setting. Journal of Occupational Medicine
- and Toxicology 2011; 6(1).
- Lundholm L, Swartz H. musculoskeletal ergonomics in
- the construction industry. Facts & figures in brief No.
- 2006. Swedish Work Environment Authority 2006.
- Dempsey PG. Psychophysical Approach to task
- analysis. Fundamentals and assessment tools for
- occupational ergonomics Second ed London: Taylor
- & Francis 2006: 918-48.
- Kuiper JI, Burdorf A, Verbeek JHAM, Frings-Dresen
- MHW, van der Beek AJ, Viikari-Juntura ERA.
- Epidemiologic evidence on manual materials handling
- as a risk factor for back disorders: a systematic review.
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1999;
- (4): 389-404.
- Reid CR, McCauley Bush P, Karwowski W, Durrani
- SK. Occupational postural activity and lower extremity
- discomfort: A review. International Journal of Industrial
- Ergonomics 2010; 40(3): 247-56.
- Russell SJ, Winnemuller L, Camp JE, Johnson PW.
- Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools.
- Applied Ergonomics 2007; 38(1): 91-7.
- Sadeghi S, Nourgostar S, Alibeygi N, Bidari A.
- Demographic differences among workers with and
- without chronic occupationallow back pain in a steel
- plant. Iranian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2006;
- (2): 143-8. [persian]
- National Safety Council [Online]. 1991; Available from:
- URL: www.nsc.org/.
- Randall SB, Jeter G. A Guide to Manual Materials
- Handling and Back Safety: Division of Occupational
- Safety and Health, North Carolina Department of
- Labor; 1997.
- Abedini R, Choobineh A, Soltanzadeh A, Gholami M,
- Amiri F, Hashyani AA. Ergonomic Risk Assessment of
- Lifting Activities; a Case Study in a Rubber Industry.
- Jundishapur J Health Sci 2013; 5(1): 9-15. [persian]
- Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H,
- Biering-SÃ¸rensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised
- Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal
- symptoms. Applied ergonomics 1987; 18(3): 233-7.
- Tayyari F, Smith JL. Manual Materials Handling.
- Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications.
- first Edition 1997 ed: Chapman & Hall London; 1997.
- p 192-207.
- Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, National
- Institute for Occupational S, Health. Applications
- manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation 1994.
- Abdoli Armky M. Manual Material Handling. Body
- mechanics and principles of work station design
- (ergonomics). Tehran: Omid Majd; 2001. p 161-8.
- Choobineh A. manual lifting activity. A guide to
- human factors and ergonomics. Shiraz 2001. p. 115-16.
- Keikha moghaddam aa. Ergonomics Assessment Methoda Selection and Application Guide. 1. 1 ed.
- Tehran: Fanavaran; 2012. p. 145-169. [persian]
- WAC 296-62-051, 2000a. Washington State
- Ergonomics Rule. Bureau of L abor and I ndustries,
- Olympia, Washington.
- WAC 296-62-051, 2000b. Explanatory Statement
- (RCW 34.05.325.6a). Washington State Ergonomics
- Rule. Bureau of Labor and Industries, Olympia,
- Washington, pp. 83â6.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer
- agreement for categorical data. biometrics 1977; 33:
- Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical
- kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority
- agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;
- : 363-74. 27 Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver
- agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37(5):
- Rahimabadi S, Khanjani N, Mardi H. The prevalence
- of musculoskeletal disorders and their related factors
- in workers of a dairy factorynishabur, iran. Journal
- of Health & Development 2012; 1(2): 121-9. [persian]
- Choobineh AR, Tabatabaei SHR, Mokhtarzadeh A,
- Salehi M. (2007). Musculoskeletal problems among
- workers of an Iranian rubber factory. Journal of
- Occupational Health 2007; 49(5): 418-23.
- Choobineh AR, Esmailian A, Mohammadbigi A.
- Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders
- in Steel Production Structures. Iran J Epidemiol 2009;
- (5): 35-43. [persian]