Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Health Foresight and Innovation Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Department of Health Services Management, Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: Technical efficiency, which is measured by calculating the ratio of products to resources, is the most important factor in assessing the efficiency status of organizations. Data envelopment analysis is useful to measure the efficiency score of all the units which have homogeneous input resources and output products and to rank them. The aim of this study was to measure and compare the efficiency of health performance in medical universities in Iran.
Methods: The present research is a cross-sectional study to measure the efficiency of health performance using the national information of the health system of Iran. Input data include hospital beds, specialists, general physicians, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, midwives, computerised topography scan and magnetic resonance imagination devices, and Gini Index; also, the output data include pregnancy care coverage, infant mortality rate, low birth weight, and in-patient days. These data were attained from the annual Ministry of Health and Medical Education report in 2017 for 46 medical universities. To estimate the efficiency of health performance of each medical university using data envelopment analysis, we designed an input-oriented model with Variable Returns to Scale in GAMS 28.2.0. The effect of contextual factors on the efficiency score was calculated using the Tobit Regression model.
Results: Results showed that only 19 (41%) medical universities were on the efficiency frontier. The highest mean of efficiency score was attributed to eastern areas, followed by the western and northern areas, and the worst status was related to southern parts of the country. The efficiency scores of universities located in northern areas were closer, while there was more difference among the efficiency scores of the universities of central areas of the country. Tobit regression shows that significant factors inefficiency include life expectancy and medical university class.
Conclusion: The results of this study emphasized the differences in the performance efficiency of medical universities. Considering the inefficiency of smaller universities, we need to make careful decisions in establishing new universities in small cities.

Highlights

Fatemeh Dehnavieh (Google Scholar)

Alireza Shakibaei (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. De Mello-Sampayo F, Vale S. Financing health care expenditure in the OECD countries: evidence from a heterogeneous, cross-sectional dependent panel. Financing health care expenditure in the OECD countries: evidence from a heterogeneous, cross-sectional dependent panel. 2014(2):207-25. doi: 10.2298/PAN1402207M.
  2. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2006. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6179-5.
  3. Ravangard R, Hatam N, Teimourizad A, Jafari A. Factors affecting the technical efficiency of health systems: A case study of Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) countries (2004–10). International journal of health policy and management. 2014; 3(2):63. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.60. PMID:25114944; PMCID: PMC4122076.
  4. LeTouzé D. Hospital bed planning in Canada: A survey analysis. International Journal of Health Services. 1984:105-26. doi: 10.2190/VP12-1P1E-HTWU-B9UH. PMID:6370877.
  5. Moradi-Lakeh M, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Health sector evolution plan in Iran; equity and sustainability concerns. International journal of health policy and management. 2015;4(10):637. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.160. PMID: 26673172. PMCID: PMC4594102.
  6. Current health expenditure (% of GDP). 2016; World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?end=2016&locations=IR&start=2000&view=chart. Accessed 19th June, 2019.
  7. Country Cooperation Strategy for WHO and the Islamic Republic of Iran 2010–2014. Cairo2010.
  8. Espitia‐Escuer M, García‐Cebrián LI. Measurement of the efficiency of football teams in the Champions League. Managerial Decision Economics. 2010;31(6):373-386. doi: 10.1002/mde.1491.
  9. Goudarzi R, Pourreza A, Shokoohi M, Askari R, Mahdavi M, Moghri Jp. Technical efficiency of teaching hospitals in Iran: the use of Stochastic Frontier Analysis, 1999–2011. International journal of health policy management. 2014;3(2):91-97. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.66. PMID: 25114947; PMCID:PMC4122082.
  10. Mohammadi S, Mirdehghan SM, Jahanshahloo G. Finding the most preferred decision-making unit in data envelopment analysis. Advances in Operations Research. 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/7171467.
  11. Jandaghi G, Matin HZ, Doremami M, Aghaziyarati M. Efficiency evaluation of Qom public and private hospitals using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Economics, Finance Administrative Sciences. 2010;22(2):83-91.
  12. Gonçalves AC, Noronha CP, Lins MP, Almeida RM. Data envelopment analysis for evaluating public hospitals in Brazilian state capitals. Revista de saude publica. 2007;41(3):427-435. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102006005000023. PMID:17515997.
  13. Hollingsworth B. Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health care management science. 2003;6(4):203-218. doi: 10.1023/A:1026255523228. PMID:14686627.
  14. Cantor VJM, Poh KL. Integrated analysis of healthcare efficiency: a systematic review. Journal of medical systems. 2018;42(1):42-48. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0848-7. PMID:29167999.
  15. Zhang X, Zhao L, Cui Z, Wang Y. Study on equity and efficiency of health resources and services based on key indicators in China. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144809. PMID:26679187; PMCID:PMC4683010.
  16. Sun J, Luo H. Evaluation on equality and efficiency of health resources allocation and health services utilization in China. International journal for equity in health. 2017;16(1):127-135. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0614-y. PMID:28709422; PMCID:PMC5513103.
  17. Campos M, Fernández-Montes A, Gavilan J, Velasco F. Public resource usage in health systems: a data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of health systems of autonomous communities in Spain. Public health. 2016;138:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.003. PMID:27129613.
  18. Stefko R, Gavurova B, Kocisova K. Healthcare efficiency assessment using DEA analysis in the Slovak Republic. Health economics review. 2018;8(1):6. doi:10.1186/s13561-018-0191-9. PMID:29523981;PMCID:PMC5845086.
  19. De Nicola A, Gitto S, Mancuso P, Valdmanis V. Healthcare reform in Italy: an analysis of efficiency based on nonparametric methods. The International journal of health planning. 2014;29(1):e48-e63. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2183. PMID:23616362.
  20. Allin S, Veillard J, Wang L, Grignon M. How can health system efficiency be improved in Canada? Healthcare Policy. 2015;11(1):33-45. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2015.24361.
  21. Jakovljevic MB, Vukovic M, Fontanesi J. Life expectancy and health expenditure evolution in Eastern Europe—DiD and DEA analysis. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics outcomes research. 2016;16(4):537-546. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1125293. PMid:26606654.
  22. de Cos PH, Moral-Benito E. Determinants of health-system efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics. 2014;14(1):69-93 . doi: 10.1007/s10754-013-9140-7. PMID:24398651.
  23. Masri MD, Asbu EZ. Productivity change of national health systems in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: application of DEA-based Malmquist productivity index. Global health research policy. 2018;3(1):22-35. doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0077-8. PMID:30083615; PMCID:PMC6069987.
  24. Revenue Distribution Report in Iran 2020. Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran; 2021.
  25. Gini coefficient 2022 [Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient.
  26. Teyfuri VA, S. Survey of Iran's human capital development index: with emphasis on Gilan province. Conference on Analysis of Population and Housing Census Findings 2012 [In persican]2013.
  27. Nasl seraji. J. Jahandideh. A OA, Jomeei. M SPATIAL PLANING OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF HEALTH IN REPUBLIC OF ISLAMIC OF IRAN. Teb va Tazkiye. 2017;26(1):11.
  28. Iran SCo. Results of the General Population and Housing Census 2016: National Statistics Portal [In persian]; 2016 [Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir.
  29. Coefficient of variation 2022 [Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_variation.
  30. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research. 1978;2(6):429-444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
  31. Ravaghi H, Taati E, Abdi Z, Meshkini A, Sarvarizadeh S. Factors influencing the geographic distribution of physicians in Iran: a qualitative study. Rural Remote Health. 2015;15(1):2967. doi: 10.22605/RRH2967.
  32. Yazdi Feyzabadi v, Mehrolhassani M, Khosravi S. Study of Geographical Inequality Trend in Distribution of Human Resources and Health Facilities in Health Sector of Iran in Past Decade. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology. 2018;13:27-30 .[In persian].
  33. Rashidian A, Jahanmehr N, Farzadfar F, Khosravi A, Shariati M, Sari AA, et al. Performance evaluation and ranking of regional primary health care and public health Systems in Iran. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07092-x. PMID:34711209 ;PMCID:PMC8555133.
  34. Keshavarzi M, Valipour H, Jamali A. The feasibility of implementing performance-based budgeting in Shiraz University of medical sciences. Journal of Health Accounting. 2014;3(1):61-83.
  35. Safizadeh H. Increase in Medical School: Threat or opportunity? . Strides Dev Med Educ. 2011;1(8):e61276. [In persian].