Document Type : Original Articles
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Background: Soft drinks consumption is a major world public health concern. This study investigates the factors which influence the students’ intention to consume fewer amounts of soft drinks, using The Extended Parallel Process Model.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 320 high schools boys in Yazd, Iran (2014). A 15-item, 5-point Likert-type scale questionnaire was used to measure the participants’ perceived susceptibility, severity, response-efficacy and self-efficacy and intention about soft drinks’ consumption. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha >0.7 for each construct) and external consistency: r = 0.79, P. =0.01) of questionnaire was approved. Data were analyzed by SPSS 16, using descriptive analysis, bivariate correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: The participants’ average soft drink consumption was 3±3.4 daily glasses. Danger control processes had more frequency over fear control ones (57.7% vs. 42.3% of participants). The intention of fewer amounts soft drinks consumption was positively correlated with perceived response efficacy, self-efficacy and total efficacy. 16% of the participants’ intention variations were explained by self-efficacy. The odds of intention towards not to consume soft drinks were significantly higher for the high efficacy/ low threat category (OR=1.51, p= 0.04) compared with low efficacy / low threat category. Conclusion:The results revealed that inducing fear is not an effective way to promote healthy drinking behavior and the choice of fear appeals is often a poor choice in this subject. It can be suggested that health educators should move from traditional threatening fear arousal messages to improving their target audience’s self-efficacy.
- French, S.A., B.-H. Lin, and J.F. Guthrie, National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents age 6 to 17 years: prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2003. 103(10): p. 1326-1331.
- Guthrie, J.F. and J.F. Morton, Food sources of added sweeteners in the diets of Americans. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2000. 100(1): p. 43-51.
- Vartanian, L.R., M.B. Schwartz, and K.D. Brownell, Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of public health, 2007. 97(4): p. 667-675.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC guide to strategies for reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Atlanta: CDC. 2010 Mar..
- Storey, M.L., R.A. Forshee, and P.A. Anderson, Beverage consumption in the US population. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2006. 106(12): p. 1992-2000.
- Dehdari, T. and T. Mergen, A survey of factors associated with soft drink consumption among secondary school students in Farooj city, 2010. Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, 2012. 9(4): p.29-34
- Ebbeling, C.B., et al., Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics, 2006. 117(3): p. 673-680.
- Kelishadi, R., et al., Thinness, overweight and obesity in a national sample of Iranian children and adolescents: CASPIAN Study. Child: care, health and development, 2008. 34(1): p. 44-54.
- Kelishadi, R., et al., Trend in the prevalence of obesity and overweight among Iranian children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition, 2014. 30(4): p. 393-400.
- Wang, Y. and T. Lobstein, Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 2006. 1(1): p. 11-25.
- Rahmanian, M., et al., Dual burden of body weight among Iranian children and adolescents in 2003 and 2010: the CASPIAN-III study. Heart Dis, 2014. 12: p. 97-103
- Ludwig, D.S., K.E. Peterson, and S.L. Gortmaker, Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. The Lancet, 2001. 357(9255): p. 505-508.
- Huang, T.T.-K. and M.A. McCrory, Dairy intake, obesity, and metabolic health in children and adolescents: knowledge and gaps. Nutrition Reviews, 2005. 63(3): p. 71-80.
- Who J, Consultation FE. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World WHO Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916(i-viii).
- World Health Organization. Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. 2010. World Health Office. 2010.
- Harnack, L., J. Stang, and M. Story, Soft drink consumption among US children and adolescents: nutritional consequences. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1999. 99(4): p. 436-441.
- Malik, V.S., M.B. Schulze, and F.B. Hu, Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2006. 84(2): p. 274-288.
- Moynihan, P. and P.E. Petersen, Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases. Public health nutrition, 2004. 7(1a): p. 201-226.
- Fishbein, M. and J.N. Cappella, The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of communication, 2006. 56(s1): p. 1-17.
- Glanz, K. and B.K. Rimer, Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice. 1997: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
- Glanz, K., B.K. Rimer, and K. Viswanath, Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 2008: John Wiley & Sons.
- Maloney, E.K., M.K. Lapinski, and K. Witte, Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2011. 5(4): p. 206-219.
- Barnett, D.J., et al., Assessment of local public health workers' willingness to respond to pandemic influenza through application of the extended parallel process model. PloS one, 2009. 4(7): p. e63-65.
- Carcioppolo, N., et al., Examining HPV threat-to-efficacy ratios in the extended parallel process model. Health communication, 2013. 28(1): p. 20-28.
- Thrasher JF, Swayampakala K, Borland R, et al. Influences of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and reactance on responses to cigarette health warnings: A longitudinal study of adult smokers in Australia and Canada. Health communication. 2016;31(12):1517-1526.
- Wong NC, Cappella JN. Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2009;37(1):1-20.
- Witte, K., et al., The Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale: A health educatorâs tool. Department of Communication Michigan State University, 1995.
- 26. Ruiter, R.A., et al., Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International journal of psychology, 2014. 49(2): p. 63-70.
- Witte, K., Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of health communication, 1996. 1(4): p. 317-342.
- Peters, G.-J.Y., R.A. Ruiter, and G. Kok, Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 2013. 7(sup1): p. 8-31.
- Napper, L.E., P.R. Harris, and W.M. Klein, Combining self-affirmation with the extended parallel process model: The consequences for motivation to eat more fruit and vegetables. Health communication, 2014. 29(6): p. 610-618.
- Floyd, D.L., S. PrenticeâDunn, and R.W. Rogers, A metaâanalysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of applied social psychology, 2000. 30(2): p. 407-429.
- Milne, S., P. Sheeran, and S. Orbell, Prediction and intervention in healthârelated behavior: A metaâanalytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2000. 30(1): p. 106-143.
- Popova L. The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior. 2012;39(4):455-473.