Peer Review Process:
The articles are primarily evaluated by our internal reviewers who check the articles for their scientific merits in concordance with our journal disciplines.
Any methodological flaw, format, and non-compliance with journal’s instructions should be avoided.
Then a submission code will be allocated and all the future contacts should be based on this code.
Through a double-blind review the articles will then be reviewed by at least three external (peer) reviewers. Their comments will be passed to the authors and their responses to the comments with the reviewers’ comments will then be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief, the Section Editor, and a final reviewer who can be a member of the Editorial Board.
The final review process will be discussed in Editorial Board sessions on a regular basis and based on their comments, and the journal’s scope.
The Editor-in- Chief will decide which articles should be published.