Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System

The Statistical Literacy of Health Information System Workforces in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2016

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Masumeh Khosravi 1
Masoud Karimi 2
Elham Bagherinezhad 3

1 MSc in statistics, Bureau of Statistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 MD, MPH, PhD in health education and promotion, department of health promotion, school of health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 BSc, Bureau of Statistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30476/jhsss.2019.81902.1014
Abstract
Background:
Nowadays, the ability to understand and interpret statistical data is the basis for any decision in all societies. In the health system, people who play a role in the information system cycle could have a significant impact on decision makers in health organizations and communities. This study was conducted to investigate the statistical literacy of the HIS managers and workers as an educational need assessment in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, statistical literacy of 89 statistics officials and statisticians working in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services was investigated via a researcher-made questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on the basic scientific requirements of the study group and educational programs held during the past two years and inspiration from the two questionnaires developed by Watson (Watson, 2003) and Shield (Shield, 2002). 
 
Results:
The mean score of the respondents (19.7) was slightly higher than half (19) of the total score. 50% of the participants obtained a score of 19 and lower.  Only 25% of the participants answered about two-thirds of the questions correctly. The statistical literacy of the participants about the measures of central tendency and using tables and charts was less than the areas of the probability and statistical inference.
Conclusion:
The findings indicate the need for designing more effective in-service training sessions and workshops for HIS workers, paying more attention to the quality of the reported health statistical data, and employing HIS workers by the health system administrators.

Keywords

Statistic
literacy
health information system
workforce
1.            Wallman KK. Enhancing statistical literacy: Enriching our society. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1993 Mar 1;88(421):1-8.
2.            Sharma S. Definitions and models of statistical literacy: a literature review. Open Review of Educational Research. 2017 Jan 1;4(1):118-33.
3.            Moore DS. Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1998 Dec 1;93(444):1253-9.
4.            Gal I. Adults' statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International statistical review. 2002 Apr;70(1):1-25.
5.            Unece: Making Data Meaningful Part 4: How to improve Statistical Literacy: A Guide for Statistical Organizations; United Nations economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. 2014.
6.            Snell L. Using chance media to promote statistical literacy. InJoint Statistical Meetings, Dallas, TX 1999.
7.            Rumsey DJ. Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education. 2002 Jan 1;10(3).
8.            Trewin D. Improving statistical literacy: The respective roles of schools and the National Statistical Offices. InTwentieth biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers 2005 (pp. 11-19).
9.            Watson J, Callingham R. Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal. 2003 Jul;2(2):3-46.
10.          Aoyama K, Stephens M. Graph interpretation aspects of statistical literacy: A Japanese perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2003 Dec 1;15(3):207-25.
11.          World Health Organization. Toolkit on monitoring health systems strengthening. WHO. 2008b. WHO. 2009:17-3.
12.          Schield M. Reading and interpreting tables and graphs involving rates and percentages. Retrievable at the Augsburg StatLit website. 2002.
13.          World Health Organization WH. Improving data quality: a guide for developing countries. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2003.
14.          Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct 1;21(10):876-84.
15.          Javadi A, Ahmadi A, Hassani S. Evaluation of Statistical Literacy among the Staff of Health Deputy in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.2014; 14(3):  194-205
Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System
Volume 6, Issue 3
July 2018
Pages 112-115

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us

Forms