Document Type: Original Article


1 Department of Medical Entomology, Research Center for Health Sciences, School of Health and Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; 2Student Research Committee,

2 Research Centre for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, Research Centre for Health Sciences, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71645-111, Shiraz, Iran


Background: The application of insecticides against vector mosquito larvae is a crucial step to control human malaria. Insecticide resistance is a major impediment to vector control strategies. The main aim of this study was to conduct laboratory and semi-field evaluations on lethal and residual effects of temephos and pyriproxyfen insecticides against malaria mosquito larvae, Anopheles stephensi.
Methods: Both susceptibility test and residual bioassay were performed to assess the lethal concentrations of each insecticide on 50% (LC50) of the IV instars larval populations and their activity periods according to standard protocols of WHO. Nine and eleven different concentrations with two sets of control in each case were applied for temephos and pyriproxyfen, respectively. Data were analyzed using probit analysis and SPSS software.
Results: The LC50 and LC90 for temephos and pyriproxyfen under laboratory conditions were 0.4 and 0.63, and 1.69 × 10-4 and 4.036 × 10-4 ppm, respectively. Although the field strain of An. stephensi larvae was completely susceptible to pyriproxyfen, there was noticeable resistance (8% mortality at the diagnostic dose) to temephos in Nikshahr County, Southeast Iran. This is the first report of resistance to temephos for this malaria main vector in Iran. Depending on the applied variable doses, the residual effects of temephos and pyriproxyfen under semi-field conditions lasted maximally for 3 and 10 weeks, respectively.
Conclusion: The high lethal and residual effects of pyriproxyfen on mosquito larvae confer an unprecedented opportunity in vector control operations leading to elimination of malaria in Iran.


  1. Moemenbellah-Fard MD, Salehi V, Banafshi O, Dabaghmanesh T. 2012. Malaria elimination trend from a hypo-endemic unstable active focus in southern Iran: predisposing climatic factors. Pathogens and Global Health 106(6): 358-365.
  2. Renshaw M, Silver JB (editors). Human malaria. In Service MW, editor. The encyclopedia of arthropod-transmitted infections of man and domesticated animals. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2001. p. 314-27.
  3. Azari-Hamidian S. Checklist of Iranian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol. 2007; 32(2): 235-242.
    1. Soltani, A., Vatandoost, H., Oshaghi, M.A., Ravasan, N.M., Enayati, A.A. and Asgarian, F., 2015. Resistance Mechanisms of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Temephos. J Arthropod-BorneDis 9(1): 71.
    2. Soltani, A., Vatandoost, H., Jabbari, H., Mesdaghinia, A.R., Mahvi, A.H., Younesian, M., Hanafi-Bojd, A.A., Bozorgzadeh, S. Field efficacy of expanded polystyrene and shredded waste polystyrene beads for mosquito control in artificial pools and field trials, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Medit Health J 2012; 18(10):1042-1048.
    3. Chen CD, Lee HL. Laboratory bioefficacy of CREEK 1.0G (temephos) against Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) larvae. Trop Biomed 2006; 23(2): 220-223.
    4. Montagna CM, Gauna LE, D’Angelo APD, Anguiano OL. Evolution of insecticide resistance in non-target black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) from Argentina. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2012; 107(4): 458-465.
    5. Yapabandara AMGM, Curtis CF. Laboratory and field comparisons of pyriproxyfen, polystyrene beads and other larvicidal methods against malaria vectors in Sri Lanka. Acta Trop 2002; 81:211-223.
    6. WHO. Malaria Entomology and Vector Control, Participant’s Guide. WHO, Geneva 2012.
    7. Alipour H, Amiri SA, Delavari A, Amiri A. Epidemiology of malaria in Nikshahr, Sistan and Baluchestan province, Southeast Iran, during 2004-2010. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2013; 6:430-4.
    8. Abbott WS. A method of comparing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1965; 18:265-267.
      1. Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. 3rd. ed. London: Cambridge University. 1972; 333 p.
      2. Vatandoost, H. and Hanafi-Bojd, A.A. Current resistant status of Anopheles stephensi liston to different larvicides in Hormozgan province, southeastern Iran, 2004. Pak J Biol Sci, 2005;8: 1568-1570.
      3. Soltani, A., Vatandoost, H., Oshaghi, M.A., Enayati, A.A., Raeisi, A., Eshraghian, M.R., Soltan-Dallal, M.M., Hanafi-Bojd, A.A., Abai, M.R. and Rafi, F. Baseline susceptibility of different geographical strains of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to temephos in malarious areas of Iran. J Arthropod-BorneDis 2013;7(1): 56.
      4. Azizi, K., Moemenbellah-Fard, M.D., Khosravani-Shiri, M., Fakoorziba, M.R. and Soltani, A. Lethal and Residual Effects of Lambdacyhalothrin, Deltamethrin and Cyfluthrin Insecticides on Adult Mosquitoes of Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) on Different Surfaces. J Health Sci Surveillance System, 2014;2(1): 30-35.
      5. Bansal, S.K. and Singh, K.V. Relative susceptibility of some common mosquito vector larvae to synthetic insecticidal compounds in north-western Rajasthan. J Environ Biol, 2007; 28(4), p.829.
      6. Abai, M.R., Hanafi-Bojd, A.A. and Vatandoost, H. Laboratory Evaluation of Temephos against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens Larvae in Iran. J Arthropod-BorneDis. 2016;10(4): 510-518.
      7. Anderasen, M.H. Emerging resistance to Temephos in Anopheles stephensi in the Al Dhahira region of Oman. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2006; pp.1-13.
      8. Omer SM, Georghiou GP, Irving SN. DDT/pyrethroid resistance interrelationships in Anopheles stephensi. Mosq News. 1980;40: 200–209.
      9. Mbare, O., Lindsay, S.W. and Fillinger, U. Dose–response tests and semi-field evaluation of lethal and sub-lethal effects of slow release pyriproxyfen granules (Sumilarv® 0.5 G) for the control of the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae sensu lato. Malaria J, 2013;12(1), p.1.
      10. Darriet, F., Corbel, V. Laboratory evaluation of pyriproxyfen and spinosad, alone and in combination, against Aedes aegypti larvae. J Med Entomol, 2006;43(6):1190-1194.
      11. Lau, K.W., Chen, C.D., Lee, H.L. and Sofian-Azirun, M. Evaluation of insect growth regulators, temephos and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis against Aedes aegypti (L) in plastic containers. Trop Biomed, 2015;32(4): 684-692.
      12. Monnerat, R., Dumas, V., Ramos, F., Pimentel L., Nunes, A., Sujii, E., Praça, L., Vilarinhos, P. Evaluation of Different Larvicides for the Control of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae) under Simulated Field Conditions. BioAssay, 2012;7(3): 1-4.
      13. Alipour, H; Ladonni, H; Abai, MR; Moemenbellah-Fard, MD; Fakoorziba, MR. Laboratory efficacy tests of pyrethroid–treated bed nets on the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi, in a baited excito-repellency chamber. Pak J Biol Sci, 2006;9(10):1877-1883.
  1. Hatam GR. Malaria, control and diagnosis. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2010; 12: 239–41.
  2. Rezanezhad H, Menegon M, Sarkari B, Hatam GR, Severini C. Characterization of the metacaspase 1 gene in Plasmodium vivax field isolates from southern Iran and Italian imported cases. Acta Trop. 2011; 119: 57-60.
  3. WHO Iran (IR). Epidemiological profile of malaria. 2010. Available from (accessed 31 August 2010).