Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Political Science, General Policy, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran

Abstract

Background: The nature of population policies in the field of health, especially population, fertility, and childbearing is complicated, so the families’ and policymakers’ decision on the quantity and quality of the reproduction and the childbearing process has been controversial. This paper was conducted to identify and explain the adverse effects of population policies on reproductive health and childbearing in 1978-2020.
Methods: This study has a  cross-sectional descriptive-analytical design. The study participants were 30 managers and specialists who studied in the fields of policy, demography, sociology, and health at university of medical sciences in Khuzestan in 2019-2020. Delphi method was used and the data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire that was standardized by calculating the validity and reliability using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The authors analyzed  data  using descriptive and inferential statistics,. The main question was whether the population policies adopted after the Islamic Revolution have challenged decision-making on reproductive health and childbearing at both levels of operational managers and the society? The main hypothesis allocated the answer "yes" to itself. However, since policymakers still do not frequently use policy-making knowledge as a criterion for public policy, there is dissatisfaction and mistrust among families who have to implement the policies.. Thereforethe new message of the researchis that in the future, any decision and manipulation on health and population should be all-inclusive and comprehensive along with conservatism and maturity.
Results: The significance level was observed in 18 items, and it indicates that population policies on reproductive health and childbearing in the studied variables have been facing challenges. The main challenges  included lack of experts in reproductive health policymaking, lack of sufficient evidence to make decisions, lack of attention to spatial planning infertility policy making, lack of a coordinated system between the Ministry of Health and other ministries, lack of ideological-based reproductive health policymaking, lack of attention to the socio-economic evaluation of population policies, and lack of long-term strategic and sustainable vision in health-based policymaking.
Conclusion: Population policies on reproductive health and childbearing after the revolution are not adequate for the country's decision-making system to achieve a proportionate and balanced population. Therefore, practical work and special responsibility accomplish the most promising demographic result

Keywords

  1. Hosseini G, Khani S. Trend Changes and Migration Patterns in the Border Provinces of Iran. Journal of NATIONAL STUDIES.2019; 4 (80); 93 - 114.
  2. Kalantari M, Yazdanpanah K, Nouri S. Analysis of the Spatial Structure of Urban and Rural Population (Case Study: Zanjan Province). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR). 2015 Jun 22;3(2):165-90.
  3. Sabermahani A, Goudarzi R, Nasiri S. Factors affecting fertility rate in Iran (panel data 1966-2013): a survey study. Journal of family & reproductive health. 2017 Sep;11(3):138.
  4. Shahpari D, Hazbavi A. Study of Immigration Impacts on Population Growth in Khuzestan Province during (1996-2011). Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development). 2019 May 22;13(3):145-62.
  5. Hoodfar H, Assadpour S. The politics of population policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Studies in family planning. 2000 Mar;31(1):19-34.
  6. Pilevar M, Amiri J. Investigating the ecological capacity of khorasan razavi province for stabilizing the population and preventing migration with land management approach, 4th international conference on geographical sciences, shiraz, kharazmi higher institute of science and technology, 2017.
  7. Baki-Hashemi S, Kariman N, Ghanbari S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Moradi M. Factors affecting the decline in childbearing in Iran: a systematic review. Adv Nurs Midwifery. 2018 Jul 22;27(4):11-9.
  8. Imandar H. New Population Policies in Iran and Individuals' Attitudes Towards It, Third National Conference on Sociology and Social Sciences, Tehran, Narkish Information Institute. 2015.
  9. Gauthier AH. The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population research and policy review. 2007 Jun;26(3):323-46.
  10. Hailemariam A. Implementation of the population policy of Ethiopia: achievements and challenges. Population Horizons. 2016;13(1):1-4.
  11. De Witte K, Geys B, Schönhage NL. Strategic public policy around population thresholds. Journal of Urban Economics. 2018 Jul 1;106:46-58.
  12. McDonald P. Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and development review. 2006 Sep 1:485-510.
  13. Miller G, Valente C. Population policy: Abortion and modern contraception are substitutes. Demography. 2016 Aug 1;53(4):979-1009.
  14. Neyer GR. Family policies and fertility in Europe: Fertility policies at the intersection of gender policies, employment policies and care policies. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; 2006.
  15. Berrington A. Perpetual postponers? Women's, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population trends. 2004;117:9-19.
  16. Camarota SA. Birth rates among immigrants in America: Comparing fertility in the US and home countries. Center for Immigration Studies; 2005.
  17. Kazemi Takmili R. Investigation of economic, social and cultural factors affecting fertility during the years 1986-1996 in the country, Master's Thesis, Demography, University of Tehran, Faculty of Social Sciences , 2000.
  18. Chamie J. Low fertility: Can governments make a difference? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America Massachusetts: 2004, 2 April.
  19. Del Boca D. The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of population economics. 2002 Aug;15(3):549-73.
  20. Mahdavi Kondeh D, Javaheri F, Safari Shali R, Maleki A. A Sociological Look at the Concept of Health in Health Policy Making, 4th International Conference on Management, Psychology and Humanities with Sustainable Development Approach, Shiraz, Center for Strategies for Achieving Sustainable Development, 2018.
  21. Khalajabadi Farahani F, Khazani S. Reproductive incentive policies and its role in the pattern of using contraceptives in women of reproductive age in Sanandaj, 2016, Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Midwifery and Infertility 2019; 22 (6).
  22. Hosseini H. Conflicting situations and the issue of population policy making in Iran. Population Quarterly. 2017; 22 (2014 and 2015): 19-46.
  23. Kazemipour S, Nasiri Pasandi H. Investigating the effect of social, economic and demographic factors on reducing the fertility rate of married women aged 15-49 in Behshahr city, Provincial Conference on Women's Health, Aliabad Katoul, Faculty of Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul Branch , 2016.
  24. Samiei Nasab M, Torabi M. Indicators and population policies in Iran. Second Impression Quarterly. 2010; 7 (11 and 12): 143-189.
  25. Wang X, Junsen Z. Beyond the Quantity–Quality tradeoff: Population control policy and human capital investment. Journal of Development Economics. 2018;135, 222-234.
  26. Ge Suqin, Dennis Tao Yang, Junsen Zhang. Population policies, demographic structural changes, and the Chinese household saving puzzle. European Economic Review. 2018; 101, 181-209.