Document Type : Review Articles

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

10.30476/jhsss.2023.99162.1788

Abstract

Background: Accidents caused by human error often lead to severe incidents. Correctly understanding human errors is essential to prevent such occurrences. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to conduct a scientometric analysis of human error research in various industries.
Methods: This study was conducted using scientometric methods. It includes all articles published and indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database. The study is a review that aims to synthesize and analyze the existing literature. In total, 845 articles were included in this study. VOSviewer and Bibliometrix, an R package, were used to perform the scientometric analysis of these articles.
Results: Industrial human error research is generally related to marine safety and accidents, the aviation industry, nuclear power plants, oil and petrochemical industries, occupational accident analysis, occupational fatigue, ergonomic issues, safety analysis of process systems, and the construction industry. Concepts such as “Human error,” “Human reliability analysis,” and “Human reliability” (with frequencies of 196, 113, and 64, respectively) were identified as the most frequently used keywords in the field of human error research.
Conclusion: The co-occurrence map of keywords in human error reveals that most studies focus on diagnosis and assessment rather than preventing human errors. Only a tiny percentage of studies address the prevention of human errors. Therefore, greater attention needs to be paid to prevention and protective measures.

Highlights

Hamed Yarmohammadi  (Google Scholar)

Mehdi Jahangiri (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. T Akhtar, R Yeganeh, Z Damiri. Identification and Assessment of Human Errors of Overhead Crane Operators using SHERPA and SPAR-H Techniques, J. Occup. Hyg. Eng. Vol. 8 (2022) 59–68. URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-679-en.html.
  2. A Babaei-Pouya, Z Pajohideh, MF Arefi. Identification and risk assessment of midwife error in the labor using systematic human error reduction and prediction approach, J. Heal. Saf. Work. 11 (2021) 737–750. URL: http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6585-en.html.
  3. Jahangiri M, Hoboubi N, Rostamabadi A, Keshavarzi S, Hosseini AA. Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant. Saf Health Work. 2016;7(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002. PMID: 27014485; PMCID: PMC4792918.
  4. M Azhdari, G Monazami Tehrani, A Alibabaei. Investigating the causes of human error-induced incidents in the maintenance operations of petrochemical industry by using HFACS, J. Occup. Hyg. Eng. 3 (2017) 22–30. URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-220-en.html.
  5. AA Garmaroudi, S Mozaffari, M Bahrami, H Alimoradi. Identification, evaluation and prioritization of human errors in the nursing population of the hospital’s coronary care unit, Iran Occup. Heal. 18 (2021) 166–179. doi: 10.52547/ioh.18.1.155.
  6. Radley DC, Wasserman MR, Olsho LE, Shoemaker SJ, Spranca MD, Bradshaw B. Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(3):470-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001241. PMID: 23425440; PMCID: PMC3628057.
  7. AM Feyer, AM Williamson, DR Cairns. The involvement of human behaviour in occupational accidents: errors in context, Saf. Sci. 25 (1997) 55–65. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00008-8.
  8. GA Shirali, A Golbaghi, L Nematpour. Comparison of Two Human Error Evaluation Techniques (HET and SHERPA) in Gas Supply Operations using AHP, J. Heal. Saf. Work. 10 (2021) 376–390. URL: http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6413-en.html.
  9. L Chen, W Li, J Li, Q Fu, T Wang. Evolution trend research of global ocean power generation based on a 45-year scientometric analysis. Sci. Eng. 9 (2021) 218. doi: 10.3390/jmse9020218.
  10. L Khalili, F Mohammadi. Scientometric Analysis of English-language Journals in the Field of Knowledge and Information Science in Iran Based on Scopus Data. Sci. Res. J. 7 (2021) 197–220. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2020.5329.1368.
  11. E Janavi, S Abdi. Scientometric analysis of scientific outputs in the field of media and information literacy, Casp. J. Sci. 8 (2021) 10–21. URL: http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/article-1-221-en.html.
  12. J Li, F Goerlandt, G Reniers. Mapping process safety: A retrospective scientometric analysis of three process safety related journals (1999–2018), J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 65 (2020) 104141. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104141.
  13. J Gao, X Wu, X Luo, S Guan. Scientometric Analysis of safety sign research: 1990–2019, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18 (2021) 273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010273.
  14. L Waltman, NJ Van Eck, ECM Noyons. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks, J. Informetr. 4 (2010) 629–635. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
  15. Haghani M, Bliemer MCJ, Goerlandt F, Li J. The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review. Saf Sci. 2020; 129:104806. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104806. PMID: 32382213; PMCID: PMC7203062.
  16. M Aria, C Cuccurullo. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, J. Informetr. 11 (2017) 959–975. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
  17. A Rey-Martí, D Ribeiro-Soriano, D Palacios-Marqués. A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016) 1651–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033.
  18. Xue J, Reniers G, Li J, Yang M, Wu C, van Gelder PHAJM. A Bibliometric and Visualized Overview for the Evolution of Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11):5985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115985. PMID: 34199608; PMCID: PMC8199718.
  19. H Liu, H Chen, R Hong, H Liu, W You. Mapping knowledge structure and research trends of emergency evacuation studies, Saf. Sci. 121 (2020) 348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.020.
  20. Bamel UK, Pandey R, Gupta A. Safety climate: Systematic literature network analysis of 38 years (1980-2018) of research. Accid Anal Prev. 2020; 135:105387. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105471. PMID: 31838322.
  21. A Zarei, I Fasihi, S Karami, A Soltanian, A Giti. Scientific productivity researchers in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences based on Bradford law in Web of Sciences database from start to 2016, Pajouhan Sci. J. 15 (2017) 36–42. URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-288-en.html.
  22. M Sedighi. Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics), Libr. Rev. 65 (2016) 52–64. doi: 10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075.
  23. M Paredes. Can Artificial Intelligence help reduce human medical errors? Two examples from ICUs in the US and Peru, 2009 (2018) 1–12. https://techpolicyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Paredes-Can-Artificial-Intelligence-help-reduce-human-medical-errors-DRAFT.pdf.
  24. M Sethu, B Kotla, D Russell, M Madadi, NA Titu, JB Coble, et al. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Detection and Mitigation of Human Factor Errors in Nuclear Power Plants: A Review, Nucl. Technol. 2022 (2022) 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00295450.2022.2067461.
  25. M Sethu, N Titu, D Hu, M Madadi, J Coble, R Boring, et al. Using Artificial Intelligence to Mitigate Human Factor Errors in Nuclear Power Plants: A Review, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2022 (2022) 129–141. doi: 10.13182/t124-34339.