Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Environmental Health Research Center, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

2 Environmental Health Research Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

3 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

10.30476/jhsss.2024.100477.1838

Abstract

Background: Waterlines in dental units can harbor various types of bacteria and microorganisms, including heterotrophic bacteria, which can pose a health risk to patients and dental personnel. This study aimed to investigate the extent of heterotrophic bacterial contamination in the waterlines of dental units and evaluate its potential as a health risk factor for occupational and patient exposure.
Methods: This cross-sectional study selected four active departments at the Faculty of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran). Bacterial contamination in the waterlines, dental handpieces, and other water-related components of dental units was investigated and analyzed in terms of Colony-Forming Units per milliliter (CFU/ml). The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signedrank tests using SPSS version 23.
Results: The mean and standard deviation of bacterial contamination across all studied departments were significantly higher than the recommended limit of 500 CFU/ml (ranging from 10,250.00±8,924.28 CFU/ml for the inlet to the water tank in the pediatric department to 275,625.00±41,520.86 CFU/ml for the air-water syringe before flushing in the surgery department). No significant differences were observed between departments (P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in bacterial contamination between different days and hours of sampling (P>0.05), although bacterial levels were higher on Saturdays and mornings. Flushing the waterlines for 30 seconds reduced bacterial contamination (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Stagnation of water in dental unit waterlines, particularly over weekends or after working hours, using reserve water during dental procedures, and insufficient flushing of dental handpieces resulted in consistently high bacterial contamination levels. Therefore, using fresh water and performing proper flushing in dental handpieces is strongly recommended to mitigate the risks associated with bacterial contamination.

Highlights

Ali Shahryari (Google Scholar)

Hamidreza Heidari (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. Szymańska J, Sitkowska J. Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:3603-11. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2812-9. PMID: 22899458. PMCID: PMC3613572.
  2. Błaszczyk B, Pajączkowska M, Nowicka J, Szymonowicz M, Zakrzewski W, Lubojański A, et al. Microbiological Evaluation of Water Used in Dental Units. Water. 2022;14(6):915. doi: 10.3390/w14060915.
  3. Ji X-Y, Fei C-N, Zhang Y, Liu J, Liu H, Song J. Three key factors influencing the bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: a 6-year survey from 2012 to 2017. Int. Dent. J. 2019;69(3):192-9. PMID: 30565215. PMCID: PMC9379084. doi: 1111/idj.12456.
  4. Some S, Mondal R, Mitra D, Jain D, Verma D, Das S. Microbial pollution of water with special reference to coliform bacteria and their nexus with environment. Energy Nexus. 2021;1:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100008.
  5. Castellano Realpe OJ, Gutiérrez JC, Sierra DA, Pazmino Martinez LA, Prado Palacios YY, Echeverría G, et al. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A potential health risk in dental practice.  Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(7):2348. PMID: 32244267. PMCID: PMC7177417. doi: 3390/ijerph17072348.
  6. Hikal W, Kačániova M, Hussein DE, Ghit A, Smaoui S, Aleem M, et al. Dental unit waterlines and health risks of pathogenic microbial contamination: An update review. J. Biol Studies. 2023;6(4):282–98-–98. doi: 10.62400/jbs.v6i4.8729.
  7. Igbokwe H, Bhattacharyya S, Gradus S, Khubbar M, Griswold D, Navidad J, et al. Preponderance of toxigenic Escherichia coli in stool pathogens correlates with toxin detection in accessible drinking-water sources. Epidemiol & Infect. 2015;143(3):494-504. PMID: 24787554. PMCID: PMC9507053. doi: 1017/S0950268814001046.
  8. Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Infection Control and Management of Hazardous Materials for the Dental Team-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 7TH Edition, 2016. eBook ISBN: 9780323764933.
  9. Hajisadeghi S, Aghaali M, Aghighi Hatamipour S, Khalifeh-Gholi M. Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination Level of Waterlines in Dental Units in Dentistry School of Qom University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Qom Uni Med Sci J. 2020;14(8):30-8. doi: 29252/qums.14.8.30.
  10. Honarmand M, Shahraki S, Farhad-Mollashahi L, Gholipour R, Ghaedi M. Evaluation of bacterial contamination of water supply in dental unit water lines at Zahedan dental school 2008. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2010;11(4). doi: 1234/knh.v11i1.1132.
  11. Malakootian M, Nowroozi H. Gram-positive cocci contamination in dental unit water lines at Kerman dental school during 2015. Kaums J (FEYZ). 2017;21(3):280-5. URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3024-en.html.
  12. Mazloomi S, Nourmoradi H, Abbasi M, Eslami A, Kazembeigi F, Nikzad N, et al. Survey on the Water Quality of Dentistry Units in Ilam City by Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2017;3(2):112-9. URL: http://newresearch.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-252-en.html.
  13. Allen MJ, Edberg SC. Health concerns of heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in dental equipment water lines. Am J Dent. 2016;29(3):137-8.PMID: 27505988.
  14. Bayani M, Raisolvaezin K, Almasi-Hashiani A, Mirhoseini SH. Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1-14. PMID: 36934281. PMCID: PMC10024400. doi: 1186/s12903-023-02885-4.
  15. Amirabadi F, Dehghan Hj, Bazrafshan E, Forghani F. Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Lines in Zahedan in 2016-2017. Jmsthums 2019; 7 (2) :44-52. URL: http://jms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-658-en.html.
  16. Hoseini Mz, Naghmachi M, Zirakfard F, Raiganshirazi A, Rezaei S, Yosefi S, et al. A study on microbial quality of water used in the dentistry units. Armaghanj, 2014; 19 (8) :707-716 URL: http://armaghanj.yums.ac.ir/article-1-134-en.html.
  17. Oleiwi R. Bacterial contamination of dental unity water lines (DUWL) in Baghdad city. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16:47-50. doi: 9790/0853-1608034750.
  18. Uzel A, Cogulu D, Oncag O. Microbiological evaluation and antibiotic susceptibility of dental unit water systems in general dental practice. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008;6(1):43-7.PMID: 18205653. doi: 1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00269.x.
  19. Malakootian M, Molazadeh P, Eskandarizadh A. Microbial and Fungal Contamination of Air at Dental Clinics and Dental Offices in Kerman. TB, 2015;13(5). URL: http://tbj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1607-en.html.
  20. Memarian M, Fazeli M, Jamalifar H, Karami S. Microbial evaluation of dental units waterlines at the department of operative dentistry, Tehran university of medical sciences in the year 2006. Jdm, 2008;21(1):65-71. URL: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/article-1-197-en.html.
  21. Szymanska J. Control methods of the microbial water quality in dental unit waterlines. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(1):1-4. PMID: 12852726.
  22. O’Donnell MJ, Boyle MA, Russell RJ, Coleman DC. Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century. Future microbiol. 2011; 6(10):1209-26. PMID: 22004039. doi: 2217/fmb.11.104.
  23. Pepper I, Gerba CP, Gentry T, Maier RM. Environmental microbiology: Academic press; 2nd Edition, 2008. ISBN-13 : ‎978-0123705198.
  24. Aghakouchakzadeh A, Mohamadzadeh M, Hamian M, Rahim Zadeh M, Esmail Shrazi S. Evaluating Bacterial Contamination of Water Supply in Dental Units at Alborz University of Medical Science Using Microbial Culture and Colony Count in 2019. Aumj 2020;9(4):31-8. URL: http://aums.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1171-en.html.
  25. Khorakian F, Movahhed T, Karbasi S, Nezafat ST, Bahramian L. Frequency evaluation of Pseudomonas SPP contamination in the dental unit water line system at Mashhad dental school. J Res Dent Sci 2019; 16 (3) :201-209 URL: http://jrds.ir/article-1-1061-en.html.
  26. Baudet A, Lizon J, Martrette J-M, Camelot F, Florentin A, Clément C. Dental unit waterlines: a survey of practices in Eastern France. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(21):4242.PMID: 31683783. PMCID: PMC6862618. doi: 3390/ijerph16214242.
  27. Cobb CM, Martel CR, McKnight III SA, Pasley‐Mowry C, Ferguson BL, Williams K. How Does Time‐Dependent Dental Unit Waterline Flushing Affect Planktonic Bacteria Levels? J Dent Educ. 2002 Apr; 66(4):549-55. PMID: 12017153.
  28. Teixeira R. Water-quality of Westbrabantse dental units and the effect of flushing. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2002 Aug;109(8):307-11. PMID: 12212457.
  29. Ghasempour M, Ghobadi Nejad M, Haji Ahmadi M, Shakki H. Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water at dental offices and dental school in the city of Babol. Jmds. 2005; 29(1, 2):97-104. doi: 22038/jmds.2005.1512.
  30. Nourmoradi H. Studying Microbial quality of dental unit water in Ilam town with Heterotrophic plate count method. Tech Res Info System. 2018;1(2). URL: http://newresearch.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-252-en.html.
  31. Hoogenkamp MA, Brandt BW, Laheij AM, de Soet JJ, Crielaard W. The microbiological load and microbiome of the Dutch dental unit;‘please, hold your breath’. Water Res. 2021; 200:117205. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117205. PMID: 34058484.
  32. Barbot V, Robert A, Rodier M-H, Imbert C. Update on infectious risks associated with dental unit waterlines. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Jul;65(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00971.x. PMID: 22469485.