Document Type : Review Articles
Authors
Nutrition Research Center, Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Background: Considering the high levels of heavy metals in Iranian rice, it is required to take measures to reduce them. One of these measures is to soak or rinse the rice before cooking, which is done in two ways in Iranian cuisine: Kateh (traditional) and Pilaw.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find the best Iranian rice recipe for reducing Cadmium (Cd) and Lead (Pb) and compare the levels of these metals in Iranian and imported rice consumed in Iran. In this study the data were found from international and national databases from 2002 to 2022. 66 non-duplicate articles were found, eight review articles, and 47 unrelated articles were removed. The remaining 11 eligible articles were studied in terms of the types of heavy metals. Considering that Pb and Cd were investigated in most of the articles, these two metals were considered for this research. Begg’s test was used to check the risk of bias.
Results: A t otal of 7 a rticles w ere fi nally s elected, a nd t he information was analyzed in Stata software. Based on Begg’s test, no sign of publication bias was found. According to the results, Pb levels decreased in cooking methods compared to Cd, and their average reached 0.00 mg/kg. Also, the results showed that soaking or rinsing raw rice before cooking reduced Cd and Pb levels in the Pilaw method more than in the Kateh method (except for two exceptions).
Conclusion: Based on this study, it is preferable to avoid importing low-quality rice with high levels of heavy metals. Also, more attention should be paid to rice cultivation in Iran to reduce the concentrations of these metals and, to reduce heavy metals, the best method is to soak the rice for a few hours before cooking, discard the water and cook it using the Pilaw method.
Highlights
Niloofar Moshfegh (Google Scholar)
Azam Abbasi (Google Scholar)
Keywords
Introduction
Rice is the second most consumed food in Iran and one of the most essential grains in the world 1 ; it is the commonest crop farmed in northern Iran. 2 The annual rice consumption in Iran is 3.2 million tons, of which 66.8% is produced domestically and 33.2% is imported. The most imported rice is from India, Pakistan, and Thailand. 3 , 4 Rice contamination with heavy metals has caused global concern. 5 It can be contaminated with a lot of pollutants, including toxic metals like Arsenic (As), Aluminium (Al), Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg), Chromium (Cr), and Lead (Pb), through the soil, water, and climatic conditions. Unlike organic pollutants, heavy metals are non-degradable and accumulate in the soil and water sources; as a result, they accumulate in different parts of the rice plant, from the roots to the rice seeds. 10 Human activities, such as irrigation with sewage, animal and chemical fertilizers, pesticides, industrial activities, and increasing urbanization, cause contamination of agricultural products with heavy metals. 11 - 17 Research has shown that rice can absorb heavy metals such as Cd, Pb, and As in paddy fields compared to other grains. 18
Studies in Iran have shown that certain types of rice do not meet national and international standards for heavy metal content. 19 - 22 Heavy metals can cause many diseases. The most important heavy metals that have adverse effects on health include Cd, Hg, Pb, As, and Nickel (Ni). 23 , 24
Some systematic reviews found that Cd, Cr, Pb, and As concentrations in rice were higher than the ISIRI (Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran) standard limit. 1 , 25 A meta-analysis showed that rice consumers in Iran were at high risk of carcinogenesis in terms of As and Pb levels. 26
Soaking or rinsing raw rice before cooking and various types of cooking, including Kateh and Pilaw (Polo), can reduce heavy metals. 27 - 29 In Iran, rice is cooked in two ways. In the Pilaw method, rice is soaked or rinsed and then boiled with a large amount of water; after that, the water is removed, and the rice is cooked. In the second method, Kateh or the traditional method, rice is soaked or rinsed, then boiled with a small amount of water and cooked without removing its water.
The most important effective parameters that can affect rice contaminants include soaking time in water, washing time, cooking method, etc. 29 - 31 A study showed that washing and soaking in the rinse method (Pilaw) significantly decreased potassium (K) and Al levels compared to the traditional method (Kateh). 32 Also, as the rice soaking time increased from 1 to 12 hours, the reduction of heavy metals increased. 33 In another study, Pb levels decreased after cooking. In addition, the amount of Pb in Pilaw was lower than that in Kateh. 34 A study showed that the combination of washing three times and soaking for six hours before cooking rice had the most significant effect on reducing heavy metals. 35 However, a study observed that the effects of rice cooking methods on the reduction of heavy metal levels did not differ significantly. 28
Given the high level of heavy metals in the rice consumed in Iran1 and the high risk of carcinogenesis, 26 measures such as rinsing and soaking before cooking may reduce heavy metals. 33 Until now, no meta-analytical study has been conducted on comparing cooking methods, so this study aimed to resolve the contradictions in this case. This study used a systematic review and meta-analysis to find the best Iranian rice recipe for reducing heavy metals Cd and Pb and compare the amount of these metals in Iranian and imported rice consumed in Iran.
Methods
Analysis method
The present study was a systematic review aiming to analyze the effects of cooking and rinsing or soaking on the reduction of Pb and Cd in rice consumed in Iran from 2002 to 2022.
Search strategy
In 2022, the researchers investigated three international databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and the Iranian database SID. Keywords for international databases included rice, heavy metals, Iran, cooking, rinsing, and soaking. Persian keywords and similar searches were used to search the Iranian database.
Screening
The initial search for studies was conducted by the first and second authors. They independently screened the studies and evaluated the article quality control.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Review articles, studies that were not part of the original research, studies for which the abstract and full text were unavailable, studies that did not investigate the effect of cooking or soaking on the amount of heavy metals, and studies with unclear data were excluded from the pool of extracted studies. After reviewing the full text of eligible articles, all the studies that investigated the effect of cooking method, soaking, or rinsing on the amount of Pb and Cd in rice consumed in Iran were included.
Data extraction
From each article, information including the author's name, number of samples, product brand, amount and type of heavy metal, cooking or rinsing method, confidence interval, place, and year was imported into Excel software. Also, the data were categorized and statistically analyzed. The information is given in Table 1.
Reference | Prevalence (CI) | Food | Sample size | Heavy metal | Brand | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fakhri et al., 201826 | 0.0352(0.0345- 0.0358) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 60 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Fakhri et al., 201826 | 0.0226(0.022- 0.0231) | Pilaw | 60 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 0.58(0.0437- 1.1162) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 15 | Cd | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 1.79(1.3548- 2.2251) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 15 | Pb | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 3.94(3.2973- 4.5826) | Pilaw | 15 | Cd | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 23.09(19.3654- 26.8145) | Pilaw | 15 | Pb | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 0.27(0.2143- 0.3256) | Pilaw | 15 | Cd | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 1.76(1.416- 2.1039) | Pilaw | 15 | Pb | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 3.81(3.5389- 4.0811) | Kateh | 15 | Cd | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Rezaei Malidareh et al., 201629 | 19.29(15.6616- 22.9183) | Kateh | 15 | Pb | Iranian | Qaemshahr |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Kateh | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Kateh | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Kateh | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Pilaw | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Pilaw | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Kateh | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Kateh | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Pilaw | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Pilaw | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Kateh | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Kateh | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Pilaw | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Pilaw | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Kateh | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Kateh | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(-0.0001-0.0001) | Pilaw | 45 | Pb | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Abbasi et al., 202035 | 0(0-0) | Pilaw | 45 | Cd | Iranian | west of Gilan |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.096(0.0599- 0.132) | Kateh | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.146(0.0911- 0.2008) | Kateh | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.522(0.412- 0.6319) | Kateh | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.063(0.0567- 0.0692) | Kateh | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 1.072(0.951- 1.1929) | Kateh | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 1.399(1.2984- 1.4995) | Kateh | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.07(0.0553- 0.0847) | Pilaw | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.088(0.0805- 0.0954) | Pilaw | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.14(0.1337- 0.1462) | Pilaw | 27 | Cd | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.696(0.5358- 0.8561) | Pilaw | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 0.949(0.5668- 1.3312) | Pilaw | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Naseri et al., 201428 | 1.295(1.2648- 1.3251) | Pilaw | 27 | Pb | Imported | Shiraz |
Zazouli et al., 201034 | 10.3(8.8102- 11.7897) | Kateh | 72 | Pb | Iranian | Babol |
Zazouli et al., 201034 | 3.45(3.0921- 3.8078) | Pilaw | 72 | Pb | Iranian | Babol |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.276(0.1976- 0.3544) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.978(0.7232- 1.2328) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.095(-0.5518- 0.7418) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.745(0.5098- 0.9802) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.186(0.088- 0.284) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.995(0.7794- 1.2106) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 600 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.153(0.0726- 0.2333) | Pilaw | 600 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Jafari-Moghadam et al., 201539 | 0.825(0.5702- 1.0798) | Pilaw | 600 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.08(0.0619- 0.098) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.069(0.0623- 0.0756) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.142(0.1069- 0.177) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.079(0.0611- 0.0968) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.068(0.0617- 0.0742) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.142(0.1069- 0.177) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.079(0.0609- 0.097) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.064(0.0577- 0.0702) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.138(0.1038- 0.1721) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.069(0.0531- 0.0848) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.058(0.0531- 0.0629) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.124(0.0932- 0.1547) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.071(0.0537- 0.0882) | Kateh | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.052(0.0471- 0.0569) | Kateh | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.13(0.0943- 0.1656) | Kateh | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.057(0.0446- 0.0693) | Pilaw | 54 | Cd | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.054(0.0487- 0.0592) | Pilaw | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.109(0.0813- 0.1366) | Pilaw | 54 | Cd | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.043(0.0375- 0.0484) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.137(0.115- 0.1589) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.675(0.5599- 0.79) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.04(0.0351- 0.0449) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.131(0.11- 0.1519) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.648(0.5354- 0.7605) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.039(0.0342- 0.0437) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.122(0.1029- .141) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.584(0.4825- 0.6827) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.028(0.0238- 0.0321) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.095(0.0793- 0.1106) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.411(0.3361- 0.4858) | Raw rinsed or soaked | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.032(0.0278- 0.0361) | Kateh | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.106(0.0895- 0.1224) | Kateh | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.62(0.4947- 0.7452) | Kateh | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.023(0.0212- 0.0247) | Pilaw | 54 | Pb | Iranian | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.088(0.0717- 0.1042) | Pilaw | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Sharafi et al., 201933 | 0.427(0.3617- 0.4922) | Pilaw | 54 | Pb | Imported | Tehran |
Risk of bias in the studies
Begg’s test was used with a significance level of 0.05 to investigate the risk of propagation bias using STATA version 13 statistical software.
Statistical analysis
To evaluate the degree of heterogeneity of the included studies, the chi-square test was used with a significance level of 0.05, I2 > 50%. In the case of heterogeneity, a random effect model with an inverse variance method was used. Otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. All analyses were performed using STATA version 13 statistical software.
Results
Systematic review
● Search results and selection of study
After searching all international and national databases, 66 non-duplicate articles were obtained, eight review articles, and 47 unrelated articles were removed. The remaining 11 articles were studied in terms of the types of heavy metals. Given that Pb and Cd were investigated in most of the articles, these two metals were considered for this research. Also, studies with inaccurate reports on the number of heavy metals were excluded. A total of seven articles were approved and entered the final analysis. The flow chart of the included studies is displayed in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the included eligible studies in systematic review and meta-analysis
● Characteristics of the studies and extracted data
The results of different studies on Cd and Pb residues in different types of rice are shown in Table 1. Cd was investigated in five studies and Pb in seven studies. Rezaei Malidareh et al. 29 found the highest concentration of Pb, 23.09 mg/kg, in rice prepared using the Pilaw method. Also, the lowest amount (0 mg/kg) related to Pb and Cd in raw Iranian rinsed or soaked rice, Pilaw, and Kateh was reported by Abbasi et al. 35
Meta-analysis results
● The effect of brand on Pb and Cd residues in rice consumed in Iran
The results of the meta-analysis showed that the amount of Pb in Iranian rice was 0.00 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.00, 0.00) and in imported rice consumed in Iran was 0.33 mg/kg (CI 95%:0.31, 0.35). Also, the amount of Cd in Iranian rice was 0.35 mg/kg (CI 95%:0.27, 0.43) and in imported rice consumed in Iran was 0.10 mg/kg (CI 95%:0.09, 0.11), as shown in Table 2.The effect of cooking method on the amount of Pb and Cd in the rice consumed in Iran
Cadmium | Lead | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean(mg/kg) | 95%CI | Mean(mg/kg) | 95%CI | |
Imported | 0.10 | 0.09-0.11 | 0.33 | 0.31-0.35 |
Iranian | 0.35 | 0.27-0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00-0.00 |
The meta-analysis found that Pb levels in Pilaw, Kateh, and raw rinsed or soaked rice were all 0.00 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.00, 0.00). The Pilaw method yielded 0.12 mg/kg of Cd (CI 95%: 0.09, 0.16), the Kateh method 0.22 (CI 95%: 0.17, 0.28) and raw rinsed or soaked rice 0.09 (CI 95%: 0.08, 0.10), as shown in Table 3.
Cadmium | Lead | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean(mg/kg) | 95%CI | Mean(mg/kg) | 95%CI | |
Pilaw | 0.12 | 0.09-0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00-0.00 |
Kateh | 0.22 | 0.17-0.28 | 0.00 | -0.00-0.00 |
Raw rinsed or soaked | 0.09 | 0.08-0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00-0.00 |
● The effect of cooking methods on the amount of Pb and Cd in imported rice
The results of the meta-analysis showed that the amount of Pb in imported rice Pilaw was 0.02 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.02, 0.02), in imported rice Kateh was 0.17 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.16, 0.19), and in imported raw rinsed or soaked rice was 0.04 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.04, 0.04), as displayed in Figure 2. Also, as shown in Figure 3, the amount of Cd in imported rice Pilaw was 0.10 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.06, 0.13), in imported rice Kateh was 0.08 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.06, 0.10), and in imported raw rinsed or soaked rice was 0.10 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.08, 0.11). It is
Figure 2. Lead concentrations in imported raw and cooked rice (1: Pilaw, 2: Kateh, 3: raw rinsed or soaked rice)
Figure 3. Cadmium concentrations in imported raw and cooked rice (1: Pilaw, 2: Kateh, 3: raw rinsed or soaked rice)
● The effect of cooking methods on the amount of Pb and Cd in Iranian rice
The results of the meta-analysis showed that the amount of Pb was 0.00 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.00, 0.00) in Iranian rice Pilaw, 0.00 mg/kg (CI 95%: -0.00, 0.00) in imported rice Kateh, and 0.00 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.00, 0.00) in imported raw rinsed or soaked rice was. It is shown in Figure 4. Also, the amount of Cd was 0.83 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.47, 1.19) in imported rice Pilaw, 1.94 mg/kg (CI 95%: -1.73, 5.60) in imported rice Kateh, and 0.08 mg/kg (CI 95%: 0.07, 0.09) in imported raw rinsed or soaked rice, which is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 4. Lead concentrations in Iranian raw and cooked rice (1: Pilaw, 2: Kateh, 3: raw rinsed or soaked rice)
Figure 5. Cadmium concentrations in Iranian raw and cooked rice (1: Pilaw, 2: Kateh, 3: raw rinsed or soaked rice)
Risk of bias in studies
Based on the Begg’s test (p >0.05), no indication of publication bias was found between studies.
Discussion
The present study focused on comparing cooking methods to reduce the levels of Cd and Pb in Iranian and imported rice consumed in Iran. The amount of Cd in imported and Iranian rice consumed in Iran was 0.10 and 0.35 mg/kg, respectively. Also, the amount of Pb in imported and Iranian rice consumed in Iran was 0.33 and 0.00 mg/kg, respectively. The results showed that the amount of Cd in Iranian rice was higher than that in imported rice, but the amount of Pb in imported rice was higher than that of Iranian rice (Table 2). These results were similar to a meta-analysis conducted on raw rice, where the average concentration of Cd and Pb in Iranian/imported rice was 0.16±.08 /0.13±.05 and 0.196±.16 /0.55±.56 mg/kg, respectively. 36
The difference in the amount of metals in Iranian and imported rice may be due to various reasons, including the amount of organic compounds and proteins in rice (to form complexes with metals), the strength and resistance of the surface layer of rice grains against water penetration (during washing and cooking) surface or deep pollution of rice grains with metals and so on. 33 The results showed that Pb decreased more than Cd in cooking methods, and its average reached 0.00 mg/kg (Table 3, Figures 2- 5). This may be because the soil and roots of plants such as rice could absorb and stabilize Pb, resulting in lower Pb levels in the rice grain. Therefore, it can be concluded that the distribution of Pb in rice is mainly superficial, and the methods of cooking, soaking, and rinsing reduce the amount of Pb more than Cd. 33 Also, the results showed that the effects of cooking and soaking or rinsing raw rice on the reduction of Cd and Pb were, respectively, soaked or rinsed raw rice> Pilaw rice > Kateh rice (Table 3, Figures 4, 5). Except for Figs 2 and 3 in which the amounts of Pb in imported rice Pilaw, Kateh, and soaked or rinsed raw rice were respectively 0.02, 0.17, and 0.04 mg/kg, the amount of Cd in imported rice Pilaw, Kateh, and soaked or rinsed raw rice were respectively 0.10, 0.08, 0.10 mg/kg. These exceptions can be ignored because of the difference of Pb in imported raw rinsed or soaked rice and Pilaw, and the difference between Cd in imported Pilaw or rinsed-soaked raw rice and Kateh was 0.02 mg/kg, which was very small.
The reason that the number of heavy metals in rinsed or soaked raw rice was lower than that of cooked rice could be that in some studies whose data were included in the meta-analysis, the rice was soaked for up to 12 hours. However, usually, in the cooking methods, rice is not soaked for so long before cooking. The results of a study have shown that the removal of metals increases with soaking time. The main reason is that the rate at which water penetrates the rice increases as the soaking period increases (that is, as the contact time between the rice and water increases). Hence, more metals are dissolved in the water, and eventually, the water containing the metals is thrown away. 30 Also, the results of studies have shown that soaking more than rinsing reduces heavy metals, and the longer the soaking time, the greater the reduction of heavy metals. 33 The reason is that, in the rinsing process, the water only comes into contact with the surface of the rice. As a result, in this process, unlike the soaking process, water cannot penetrate the inner layers that contain heavier metals. 37
Based on the results of this study, the Pilaw method was more effective in removing heavy metals than the Kateh method. The main reason for this difference is that in the Pilaw method, the water in which the rice is boiled is thrown away because the remaining water after the cooking process contains a certain number of heavy metals that dissolve in the water.
The strength of this study was that no meta-analytical research has been conducted on the effect of cooking methods, rinsing, and soaking on the reduction of heavy metals in consumed rice in Iran, and this is the first meta-analytical study in this regard. One of the weaknesses of this research was that only cooking methods and soaked or rinsed raw rice were compared, and raw rice was not included in this study. The reason was that many studies have been conducted on raw rice in Iran, but few studies have been conducted on cooked rice. Therefore, comparing the averages would not be accurate if raw rice data were also included.
Conclusion
The widespread consumption of rice laden with heavy metals in Iran requires measures to be taken by authorities. It is better to avoid the import of low-quality rice that has high heavy metals. For reducing these metals, more attention should be paid to the field of rice cultivation in Iran (especially irrigation sources, pesticides, and fertilizers). Also, the best method for reducing heavy metals is to soak the rice for several hours before cooking, discard the water, and cook it using the Pilaw method.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for financial support.
Authors’ Contribution
NM: Record searching, Data extraction, Quality assessment, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Quality assessment, Project administration, Resources, supervision, review & editing. EB: Software, Quality assessment, review &; editing.
Funding
This study was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) (project no 1396-01-106-15015).
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
- Abtahi M, Fakhri Y, Oliveri Conti G, Keramati H, Zandsalimi Y, Bahmani Z, et al. Heavy metals (As, Cr, Pb, Cd and Ni) concentrations in rice (Oryza sativa) from Iran and associated risk assessment: a systematic review. Toxin Rev. 2017; 36(4):331-341. DOI
- Hoseini M, Mafton M, Karimian N, Ronaghi A, Emam Y. Effect of zinc and bore on growth and chemical composition of rice. Iranian J Agricul Sci. 2005; 36(4):869-883.
- Tehran chamber of commerce, industries, mines and agriculture (TCCIMA). https://en.tccim.ir/
- Behrouzi R, Marhamatizadeh MH, Shoeibi S, Razavilar V, Rastegar H, Keisan K. Study of the concentration of Arsenic, Cadmium and lead heavy metals in different types of domestic and imported Rice of Iran. Arch Hyg Sci. 2018; 7(3):150-156. DOI
- Thielecke F, Nugent AP. Contaminants in grain—a major risk for whole grain safety?. Nutrients. 2018; 10(9):1213. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
- Behrouzi R, Marhamatizadeh MH, Razavilar V, Rastegar H, Shoeibi S. Effects of the pre-cooking process using acetic acid and citric acid on lead concentration in rice. Pol J Environ Stud. 2020; 29:545-551. DOI
- Halder D, Saha JK, Biswas A. Accumulation of essential and non-essential trace elements in rice grain: Possible health impacts on rice consumers in West Bengal, India. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 706:135944. DOI | PubMed
- Amiri-Qandashtani R, Mohamadi Sani A. Heavy metals in rice samples on the Torbat-Heidarieh market, Iran. Food Addit Contam Part B. 2017; 10(1):59-63. DOI | PubMed
- Wang C, Duan H-Y, Teng J-W. Assessment of microwave cooking on the bioaccessibility of cadmium from various food matrices using an in vitro digestion model. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014; 160:276-284. DOI | PubMed
- Arunakumara K, Walpola BC, Yoon M-H. Current status of heavy metal contamination in Asia’s rice lands. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 12:355-377. DOI
- Alfaraas AJ, Khairiah J, Ismail B, Noraini T. Effects of heavy metal exposure on the morphological and microscopical characteristics of the paddy plant. J Environ Biol. 2016; 37(5):955. PubMed
- Ihedioha JN, Ujam OT, Nwuche CO, Ekere NR, Chime CC. Assessment of heavy metal contamination of rice grains (Oryza sativa) and soil from Ada field, Enugu, Nigeria: Estimating the human healtrisk. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2016; 22(8):1665-1677. DOI
- Kong X, Liu T, Yu Z, Chen Z, Lei D, Wang Z, et al. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in rice from a high geological background area in Guizhou Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(10):2281. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
- Nacke H, Gonçalves A, Schwantes D, Nava I, Strey L, Coelho G. Availability of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, and Cr) in agriculture from commercial fertilizers. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013; 64:537-544. DOI | PubMed
- Naghipour D, Amouei A, Nazmara S. A comparative evaluation of heavy metals in the different breads in iran: A case study of rasht city. Health Scope. 2014; 3(4):e18175. DOI
- Neeratanaphan L, Khamma S, Benchawattananon R, Ruchuwararak P, Appamaraka S, Intamat S. Heavy metal accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa) near electronic waste dumps and related human health risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2017; 23(5):1086-1098. DOI
- Rahman A, Hossain SM, Akramuzzaman MM. Distribution of heavy metals in rice plant cultivated in industrial effluent receiving soil. Environment Asia. 2010; 3(2):15-19.
- Huang C-L, Bao L-J, Luo P, Wang Z-Y, Li S-M, Zeng EY. Potential health risk for residents around a typical e-waste recycling zone via inhalation of size-fractionated particle-bound heavy metals. J Hazard Mater. 2016; 317:449-456. DOI | PubMed
- Mehrnia MA. Cadmium levels in rice product of south of Iran and its daily intake. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2013; 5(22):2666-2668.
- Naseri M, Vazirzadeh A, Kazemi R, Zaheri F. Concentration of some heavy metals in rice types available in Shiraz market and human health risk assessment. Food Chem. 2015; 175:243-248. DOI | PubMed
- Pirsaheb M, Fattahi N, Sharafi K, Khamotian R, Atafar Z. Essential and toxic heavy metals in cereals and agricultural products marketed in Kermanshah, Iran, and human health risk assessment. Food Addit Contam Part B. 2016; 9(1):15-20. DOI | PubMed
- Rezaiyan AF, Hesari J. A study on contamination of white rice by cadmium, lead and arsenic in Tabriz. Food Research Journal. 2014; 23(4): 581-594.
- Siripongvutikorn S, Asksonthong R, Usawakesmanee W. Evaluation of harmful heavy metal (Hg, Pb and Cd) reduction using Halomonas elongata and Tetragenococcus halophilus for protein hydrolysate product. FFHD. 2016; 6(4):195-205. DOI
- Sun Y, Zhou Q, Diao C. Effects of cadmium and arsenic on growth and metal accumulation of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99(5):1103-1110. DOI | PubMed
- Sharafati Chaleshtori F, Rafieian Kopaei M, Sharafati Chaleshtori R. A review of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa) of Iran. Toxin Rev. 2017; 36(2):147-153. DOI
- Fakhri Y, Bjørklund G, Bandpei AM, et al. Concentrations of arsenic and lead in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Iran: a systematic review and carcinogenic risk assessment. ood Chem Toxicol. F2018; 113:267-277. DOI | PubMed
- Ghoochani M, Dehghani MH, Mehrabi F, et al. Determining additional risk of carcinogenicity and non-carcinogenicity of heavy metals (lead and arsenic) in raw and as-consumed samples of imported rice in Tehran, Iran. ESPR. 2019; 26:24190-24197. DOI | PubMed
- Naseri M, Rahmanikhah Z, Beiygloo V, Ranjbar S. Effects of two cooking methods on the concentrations of some heavy metals (cadmium, lead, chromium, nickel and cobalt) in some rice brands available in Iranian Market. J Chem Health Risks. 2014; 4(2):65-72. DOI
- Rezaei Malidareh R, Shokrzadeh M, Khasi B, Rouhi S, Zaboli F. Survey and comparison of different processes effect, rinsing and baking on remaining amount of heavy metals lead and cadmium in cultivated Tarom rice in Qhaemshahr city paddies in northern Iran. J Environ Health Res. 2016; 2(1):52-59. DOI
- Adibi H, Mazhari M, Bidoki SK, Mahmoodi M. The effect of washing and soaking on decreasing heavy metals (Pb, Cd and As) in the rice distributed in Kermanshah in 2011. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2014; 17(10):e74332. DOI
- Mihucz VG, Silversmit G, Szalóki I, Samber B De, Schoonjans T, Tatár E, et al. Removal of some elements from washed and cooked rice studied by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and synchrotron based confocal micro-X-ray fluorescence. Food Chem. 2010; 121(1):290-297. DOI
- Shariatifar N, Rezaei M, Alizadeh Sani M, Alimohammadi M, Arabameri M. Assessment of rice marketed in Iran with emphasis on toxic and essential elements; effect of different cooking methods. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020; 198:721-731. DOI | PubMed
- Sharafi K, Yunesian M, Nodehi RN, Mahvi AH, Pirsaheb M, Nazmara S. The reduction of toxic metals of various rice types by different preparation and cooking processes–Human health risk assessment in Tehran households, Iran. Food Chem. 2019; 280:294-302. DOI | PubMed
- Zazouli MA, Bandpei AM, Ebrahimi M, Izanloo H. Investigation of cadmium and lead contents in Iranian rice cultivated in Babol region. Asian J Chem. 2010; 22(2):1369.
- Abbasi A, Sadeghi SM, Tayefe M. Effects of rinsing and cooking methods on concentration of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr) in rice. J Food Hyg. 2020; 10:73-85. DOI
- Jafari A, Kamarehie B, Ghaderpoori M, Khoshnamvand N, Birjandi M. The concentration data of heavy metals in Iranian grown and imported rice and human health hazard assessment. Data Brief. 2018; 16:453-459. DOI | PubMed
- Morekian R, Rezaee E, Azadbakht L, Mirlohi M. Cooking elements affecting on heavy metal concentration in rice. J Health Syst Res. 2013; 9(13):1394-1405.
- Hajeb P, Sloth JJ, Shakibazadeh S, Mahyudin NA, Afsah‐Hejri L. Toxic elements in food: occurrence, binding, and reduction approaches. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2014; 13(4):457-472. DOI | PubMed
- Jafari-Moghadam R, Ziarati P, Salehi-Sormaghi MH, Qomi M. Comparative perspective to the chemical composition of imported rice: association of cooking method. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2015; 8(1):149-155. DOI