Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

3 Non-communicable Disease Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 HIV/AIDS Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

10.30476/jhsss.2024.101253.1870

Abstract

Background: One of the oldest social and health challenges to health is the global sex trading, which mainly involves young individuals. The issue has been dramatically worsening worldwide due to socio-economic and cultural changes. This study was conducted to determine the factors associated with prostitution among young Iranian sex workers.
Methods: This is a case-control study on 400 women including 200 prostitute women as the case group and 200 women randomly selected from the population as the control group. Women in the control group were frequency matched with the age and family physician of the women in the case group.
Results: Unlike forced marriage, the case group had lower odds of pre-marriage relationship with the spouse along with parent’s consent when compared to forced marriage (OR remarriage relationship with family consent vs. forced marriage=0.05, 95% CI: 0.011, 0.25, P<0.001). Prostitution in individuals who reported friendship with a friend with high risk behaviors during late childhood or adolescence was higher than those without such friendship (OR friend with risky behavior vs. without risky behavior friend=13.45, 95% CI: 4.07, 53.4, P<0.001). Also, cases had a lower odd of being under a tied parental control during childhood and adolescence (OR tied vs. no parental control control=0.16, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.6, P=0.008). Finally, having single parent family was more common among the case group (OR single parent vs. nuclear family=6.33, 95% CI: 2.02, 21.78, P=0.002).
Conclusion: The current study revealed the importance of parent’s involvement in the children’s and adolescent’s social and behavioral development and successful marriage in tendency toward prostitution. The other important factors that seem to considerably affect the tendency of the participants toward prostitution were having a girlfriend with risky behavior (having sexual relationship at younger age or stealing) and easy and uncontrolled access to private media during adolescence. Also, parents of prostitute women had a lower socio-economic status who had no or weak parental supervision during the participant’s adolescence. Again, these factors are directly or indirectly affected by parental family functioning, highlighting the importance of parents’ involvement in the development of their children. Most important factors reported in this study are modifiable, and designing effective parental training programs regarding supervising and supporting children is highly recommended.

Highlights

Fatemeh Askari (Google Scholar)

Mohammad Fararouei (Google Scholar)

Keywords

Introduction

One of the important social challenges in today's world is global sex trading which is expanding due to cultural changes, immigration, and economic crises 1 . Prostitution can be defined as accepting a sexual relationship in exchange for money or gift, life expenses, food, etc. 2 . Although, by definition, prostitution also includes men and children (boys and girls), due to the far higher involvement of young women, the term prostitute is normally used for female prostitutes 3 . Prostitution poses social, mental, and health-related risks to the providers and their clients. For example, unsafe sexual intercourse exposes both sides to a higher risk of many types of sexually transmitted infections including HIV and viral hepatitis 4 . In addition, studies suggest that prostitutes are at a higher risk of violence and discrimination during their working life 5 . In that regard, a report from Australia, among nearly 10,000 prostitute women, suggested that street prostitution was the most common and dangerous type of prostitution. However, it is suggested that most injuries and dangers to prostitute women take place in a private environment 6 . Due to the importance of these issues, prostitutes are considered vulnerable members of society with a higher priority of receiving social and health protection services by social and health authorities 5 .

Although prostitution is illegal in many countries, evidence shows that prostitution is rising as a career in many parts of the world . In addition, depending on the economic status, social policy, and other related factors, the determinants of prostitution seem significantly vary in different countries. For example, prostitution in women over 15 years of age is reported to be highly different among different countries and regions (e.g. African: 0.4% - 4.3%, Asian: 0.2% - 2.6%, and European: 0.1% - 1.4% countries) .

In Iran, prostitution is an illegal and punishable act and prostitutes use various places to work undercover (e.g. working on the streets and in private places) to prevent the legal consequences 12 . As a result of the hidden activities of prostitute women, no exact estimate on the population of prostitutes and their condition is available and our current knowledge is scarce. In Iran, prostitution is illegal, and the exact number of prostitutes is unknown due to the clandestine nature of the activity. However, various sources indicate an increase in prostitution in recent years 13 . According to a study conducted in 2017, there were about 228,700 prostitutes in Iran 13 , suggesting a constant and alarming rise in the prevalence of prostitution in Iran 14 . As a result, controlling prostitution, as a social and health priority in Iran, needs the understanding of its contributing factors. Several Iranian studies have been published in that regard. For example, the results of studies in Iran suggested that unemployment and poverty were important reasons for prostitution 15 , 16 . Substance use is another factor that is reported to be more common among prostitutes when compared to the population of women in Iran 17 , 18 . However, searching the existing evidence reveals that our knowledge about the determinants of prostitution among the Iranian population is scarce 19 , and most published studies used descriptive designs with studying comparably very limited range of prostitution potential contributing factors. The aim of this study was to provide a better understanding of prostitution and investigate the factors influencing people’s tendency to prostitution.

Methods

Settings

This is a case-control study on 400 women with 17-49 years of age in Shiraz, the capital of Fars province. Shiraz is a multicultural city with about 1560000 populations. In Shiraz, the “vulnerable women support center (VWSC)” was established under Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with three stations in different areas of the city. The center is responsible for providing high-risk women (including abused women and female sex workers) with free health and consulting services, including psychological consultation, health education and prevention, diagnosis, and treatment services for STIs. A significant number of prostitute women are registered with the center (the number of registered women is not to be announced publicly by the center). In addition, for respecting the privacy and safety of the women, any access to the women is allowed via the centers’ staff only.

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) Local Ethics Committee with the code of IR.SUMS.REC.1398.564. Since the participants denied signing any form, verbal informed consent was obtained from all of them by their peer interviewers. Also, the study questionnaire was completed anonymously.

Selection of cases

Due to being a hidden segment of the Iranian society (working in the sex industry is illegal in Iran and has serious legal consequences), there was no access to the study population; therefore, probability sampling was not applicable. As a result, snowball sampling was used to reach the FSWs in the capital of Fars province with the help of voluntary FSWs who were registered with vulnerable women's center (VWC) as peers to reach a more representative sample of FSWs. Being interviewed with their peers, the case participants were more confident about the anonymity and privacy of their responses to sensitive questions. After training voluntary FSWs with at least mandatory education as interviewer, we reached the required number of participants and after obtaining verbal informed consent from the participants (to keep the anonymity of the participants), we interviewed the participants. Participants were included if they were female, were 17-49 years old, and had sexual intercourse in exchange for livelihood (i.e., money, goods, services, or drugs) with more than one client in the previous 12 months 13 . Selection of participants and interview processes were conducted in Autumn 2019.

Selection of controls

To maintain representativeness via probability sampling, the participants in the control group (n=200) were randomly selected from women who were registered with similar family physicians (health centers) of the women in the case group. The names of the control participants were randomly selected from a list of individuals registered with the pre-defined family physicians. The selected individuals were invited to their health center via a phone call and interviewed with a trained family nurse. The participant’s family nurse, as the interviewer, helped the participants to be more confident about the privacy of information they provided. During the phone call, the individuals were invited to a routine checkup and introduced to the aims and procedure of the interview. Those who failed to be contacted or refused to come to the health center were replaced with the same selection procedure. The control and case participants were restricted to female sex and frequency-matched for age (±4years) and family physician. No effort was made to confirm that the participants in the control group were not providing sex for money. However, with regard to the very low estimated prevalence rate of prostitution in Iran provided by the previous studies 13 , the authors expect no significant effect of misclassification bias on the results of the study 20 .

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Individuals younger than 17 and older than 49 years of age and those who had apparent physical deformities, disabilities, or mental retardation were excluded from the study sample.

Data collection

A specially designed interview-administered questionnaire was made by the research team to collect the required data. The questionnaire was evaluated in terms of reliability (Cronbach's alpha, 92.3%), using data from a test-retest pilot study (n=20). All interviewers took part in training sessions before conducting interviews. The sessions included an introduction to the study and ethical considerations, the principles of interviewing, and practice and evaluation of the interviewers. The questionnaire consisted of two parts; the first part contained demographic information (age, marital status, education, career, perceived economic status of parents, marital status, spouse's job if married, and the participant’s parent’s job and education). The second part of the questionnaire contained questions regarding family and behavioral factors during adolescence including the type of parental family, tension in the relationship between parental family members, strength of parental supervision, addiction among the family members, presence of a girlfriend with risky social (e.g. addiction or stealing) and sexual behavior, the source from which the individual first received sexual information, and media source for entertainment during adolescence. The participants also answered questions regarding alcohol and drug consumption, history of imprisonment, and how they married to their husbands. All factors were defined regarding the time before the cases started working as prostitutes.

Sample size and statistical analysis

Based on the results of the pilot study, given the type one error at a<0.05 and power at 80%, and OR as small as 2 for the association of prostitution with the type of family, the estimated sample size required for the study was n=400 (200 cases and 200 women as controls). Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois., USA). Chi-square (Fisher exact test if required) and student-t tests were used to measure unadjusted associations. Multiple logistic regression was used to measure the adjusted associations of the study variables and prostitution.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

Comparison of the demographic status of the participants showed that most of the participants in the case group were not living with a spouse (single, divorced, or widowed, 66% in comparison with 5% in the control group, p<0.001). In addition, the level of education in the case-group was lower than the controls (56% not finished compulsory education in comparison with 14% in control group, p<0.001). Most participants in the case-group were unemployed or did not have permanent jobs (80% in comparison with 44% in control group, p<0.001). With regard to the financial status of the participants’ parental family, participants in the case group were predominantly in lower social class (53% in comparison with 13% in the control group, p<0.001). Similarly, fathers of the participants of the case-group were mainly unemployed or had temporal or part time jobs (53% in comparison with 33% in the control-group, p<0.001). With regard to the education of the parents, the results suggested that in the case-group, fathers and mothers were more frequently illiterate (34% in comparison with 14% in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the participants’ age (mean=33.38±7.93 in the case-group compared to the mean of 33.68±7.47 in the control-group, p>0.05) (Table1). The lowest and highest age of the selected participants were 17 and 49 years, respectively. The distribution of the behavioral variables of the participants in the case and control groups are presented in Table 2.

Catrgory Case N(%) Control N(%) p.value
Mrital status !Single 132(%66) 10(%5) <0.001
Married 68(%34) 190(%95)
Education High school 113(%56) 29(%14) <0.001
Diploma 74(%37) 69(%35)
University degree 13(%7) 102(%51)
Job Unimployed or part time job 161(%80) 89(%44) <0.001
Employed 39(%20) 111(%56)
Husband‘s job Unimployed or part time job 37(%19) 24(%12) <0.001
Employed 50(%25) 172(%86)
Single 113(%56) 4(%2)
Parental family’s financial status Poor and very poor 106(%53) 27(%13) <0.001
Medium 74(%37) 83(%4)
Good and very good 20(%10) 90(%45)
Father‘s job Jobless or non-permanent job 106(%53) 66(%33)
Employed 94(%47) 134(%67)
Father‘s education Illiterate 69(%34) 28(%14) <0.001
Elementary 85(%43) 85(%42)
Diploma 18(%9) 37(%19)
University degree 28(%14) 50(%25)
Mother‘s education Illiterate 80(%40) 46(%23) <0.001
Elementary 91(%45) 98(%49)
Diploma 13(%7) 21(%11)
University degree 16(%8) 35(%17)
! Including divorced and widowed
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the case and control groups
Group Case N (%) Control N (%) p.value
Type of family Nuclear 74(%37) 152(%76) <0.001
No parent 63(%31) 24(%12)
Single parent 45(%32) 24(%12)
Stressful family relationships Not at all 35(%17) 74(%37) <0.001
Seldom 46(%23) 86(%43)
Very often 66(%33) 31(%15)
Always 53(%27) 9(%5)
Parental supervision Not at all 38(%19) 4(%2) <0.001
Seldom 60(%30) 21(%10)
Sometime 66(%33) 79(%40)
Always 36(%18) 96(%48)
Addiction among family members Yes 113(%57) 30(%15) <0.001
No 87(%43) 170(%85)
Alcohol consumption Yes 67(%34) 4(%2) <0.001
No 133(%66) 196(%98)
Illicit drug use Yes 32(%16) 0(%0) <0.001*
No 168(%84) 200(%100)
History of imprisonment Yes 25(%13) 0(%0) <0.001*
No 175(%87) 200(%100)
Friends with risky behaviors Yes 100(%50) 25(%12) <0.001
No 100(%50) 175(%88 )
Introduced to sexual issues by School teacher 10(%5) 16(%8) <0.001
Friends and family 144(%72) 147(%73)
Satellite 32(%16 ) 7(%4)
Others 14(%7) 30(%15)
Media source for entertainment Tv network and movies 120(% 60) 183(%92 ) <0.001
Satellite 51(%26 ) 9(%4)
DVDs 29(%14) 8(%4)
Married to husband with Without relationship before marriage and family willing without my consent and 20(%10) 11(%5) <0.001
Relationship before marriage with family and my consent 25(%12) 117(%59)
Relationship before marriage and only my willing without family consent 23(%12) 58(%29)
Relationship before marriage without family consent 15(%8) 10(%5)
Not marrid 117(%58) 4(%2)
Living with spouse yes 47 (23.5) 183 (91.5) <0.001
No 153 (76.5) 17 (8.5)
*calculated based on Fisher exact test
Table 2. Family function and behavioral characteristics of the case and control groups

Multivariable analysis

The results of multiple logistic regression suggested that unemployed women had much higher odds of prostitution compared to those who were employed (OR unemployed vs. employed=6.94, 95% CI=2.61-20.53, P<0.001). Odds of prostitution was lower in individuals with a university degree than those with unfinished compulsory education (OR university degree vs. unfinished compulsory =0.08, 95% CI=0.01-0.33, P< 0.001). Also, for individuals whose family had a good economic status, the odds of prostitution was much lower than ones who had low economic status (OR=0.08, 95%CI=0.02-0.30, P< 0.001). The odds of prostitution in individuals who had no spouse was much higher than those who were living with their spouse (OR with spouse vs. without spouse=19.38, 95% CI=3.99-111.34, P<0.001). Similarly, the odds of prostitution among individuals who reported to have friends with risky behaviors was higher than those without such friends (OR high risk friend vs. no high risk friend=13.45, 95% CI=4.07-53.4, P<0.001). Marrying with family force without the participant’s consent was a powerful predictor of prostitution. For example, those who were in a pre-marriage relationship with family’s consent had significantly lower odds of becoming a prostitute than those unwillingly married due to being forced by parents (OR unwillingly married vs. pre-marriage relationship with parent’s consent =0.05, 95%CI=0.011-0.25, P< 0.001). Also, the odds of prostitution among individuals who were under parental supervision was much lower than those with no parental supervision (OR tied parental supervision vs. no parental supervision=0.16, 95% CI=0.04-0.6, P=0.008). Compared to those with nuclear family (living with both parents), the odd having a single parent family during their adolescent was higher in the case group (OR single parent vs. both parents =6.33, 95%CI= 2.02-21.78, P=0.002). Finally, women in the case group reported more unsupervised access to private media during their adolescent (OR private vs. public =6.33, 95% CI= 2.02-21.78, P=0.002) (Table 3).

Variable (n=400)
OR* 95% CI P
Job Employed 1.00 - -
Jobless or non-permanent job 6.94 2.61,20.53 <0.001
Living with spouse With spouse 1.00 - -
Single! 19.38 3.99,111.34 <0.001
Friends with risky behavior No 1.00 - -
Yes 13.45 4.07,53.4 <0.001
I married to my husband with Family willing without my consent 1.00 - -
Without family consent 0.19 0.04,0.83 0.03
Relationship before marriage without family consent 0.29 0.04,1.78 0.18
Relationship before marriage with family consent 0.05 0.011,0.25 <0.001
Not married 0.37 0.03,3.85 0.39
Parental supervision Not at all/ seldom 1.00 - -
Very often 0.16 0.04,0.6 0.008
Always 0.30 0.08,1.02 0.05
Type of family Nuclear 1.00 - -
Single parent 6.33 2.02,21.78 0.002
No parent 3.51 1.01,12.7 0.04
Education High school 1.00 - -
Diploma 0.48 0.16,1.34 0.16
University degree 0.08 0.01,0.33 <0.001
Parental family financial status Poor and very poor 1.00 - -
Medium 0.10 0.02,0.31 <0.001
Good and very good 0.08 0.02,0.30 <0.001
Media source for entertainment Public^ 1.00 - -
Private^^ 4.94 1.64,16.31 0.005
*The baseline model consisted of marital status, education, job, husband‘s job, parental family financial status, father‘s job ,father‘s education, mother’s education, parental supervision, stressful family relationship, addiction among family members,alcohol consumption, illicit drug use ,history of imprisonment, girlfriend with risky behavior, how first introduced to sexual issues, media used for entertainment, how married, i.e. TV and cinema, ^^i.e. DVDs satellite and other private media; including divorced and widowed
Table 3. The association of the study variables and becoming a sex worker

Discussion

Results of our study revealed significant statistical associations between several demographic and behavioral factors and prostitution. The results suggested that prostitute women mostly had no permanent job, and if they were employed, they had low-income careers. As a result, they use prostitution as a financially supporting job that provides better income for supplying their living costs 12. Based on a review study, being financially restraint or dependent raises the risk of prostitution among women 21 . Similarly, findings from a study in the United States suggested that poverty and homelessness were associated with early prostitution. Accordingly, prostitute women who were living on streets or in shelters were more likely with limited education and less employment opportunities and entered prostitution at younger age 22 .

As our study suggested, women with lower income and less educated parents were more likely to become a prostitute in later life. In line with the results of the current study, a cross-sectional study on Iranian prostitutes suggested that most of them were coming from families with low socio-economic status 23 . The reasons for observing such association are possibly the effect of neighborhood and family environment and friendship as well as the condition of living and education of children 24 .

In addition, our study results revealed that living with spouse (successful marriage) might prevent prostitution via supporting marriage. Similarly, another study suggested that the presence of spouse as a financial, emotional and social supporter was a strong family- related preventive factor for prostitution 25 .

Another important family-related risk factor of prostitution in our study was parental forced marriage. Accordingly, pre-marriage dating with fiancé when the family is supporting the relationship is a powerful inversely associated factor for divorce and prostitution. We believe that a couple’s approach to engagement is a good predictor of successful marriage and prostitution. In that regard, although no study on the same subject was found, a study reported that dating was a facultative factor for successful marriage 26 .

According to the results of the present study, parental supervision on adolescent’s friendship and behavior is an important prostitution-associated factor. This finding is also indirectly supported by some other studies by suggesting that parental supervision is a protective factor for preventing delinquent behaviors among adolescents 27 . According to the results of our study, prostitute women had a much lower odds of having both parents around compared to the control group. Again, the results of other studies suggest that both-parent families have better family relationship and social positions and their children have less risky behaviors 28 . With regard to education, the results of our study suggested that achieving better education was a potentially powerful preventive factor for prostitution. Lower education has been introduced as a strong risk factor for prostitution in several studies from different regions 29 - 31 . Studies suggested that those with lower education were significantly more prone to prostitution at younger age than well-educated individuals 29 . Also, the findings of a survey on prostitute women working on streets in the US suggested that these women had limited educational backgrounds and often had not completed high school 30 . It seems that more educated women have more opportunities to achieve better social status and job, factors which can affect prostitution. The results of the present study also revealed that having a friend with risky behaviors was a very strong factor contributing to prostitution. The result is in accordance with those of other studies suggesting the type of friendship is a significant factor for delinquency among adolescents. Finally, the results of the present study suggested that access to unsupervised private media, such as satellite channels and DVDs, was a strong factor contributing to prostitution . This finding is supported by a study on media and sexual health 32 .

Strengths and limitations: Unlike many other studies on the same subject that predominantly used a cross-sectional design, our present study used a case-control design to measure the potential associations between several social and family-related factors and prostitution. As prostitution is illegal in Iran, the real population size of sex workers is unknown. Therefore, it was not possible to include all prostitute women in the sampling frame, and selection bias could not be ruled out in the current situation. Due to social and personal sensitivity of the research subject, no attempt was made to define whether the selected controls were prostitutes or not. Concerning the expected low prevalence of prostitution in most Muslim countries, misclassification of the participants in the control group is not believed to make any significant change in the results.

Conclusion

One of the most powerful predictors of prostitution among the participants of our study was the method of dating and marrying a husband. Providing young women and their parents with proper consultation can prevent dysfunctional families, divorces, and perhaps prostitution. Parental supervision regarding a child’s social and friendship network and media usage may prevent many social and behavioral malalignments. Parents, if properly trained and prepared for parenting, can provide their children with a safe and productive family and friendship environment to achieve proper education and social status. Research on effective programs for training parents and adolescents is highly recommended.

Abbreviations used

AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

CI: confidence interval

OR: odds ratio

SVWSC: Shiraz Vulnerable Women Supporting Center

Acknowledgements

The present study is a part of the M.Sc. thesis (Factors associated with prostitution among young women in Iran) written by Fatemeh Askari under the supervision of Professor Mohammad Fararouei. We thank the participants for their time and kind participation in the interview. We also thank Miss Romina Fararouei for helping in the revision of the text.

Authors' Contributions

MF and FA co-designed the study and survey materials. FA were involved in data collection. MF did the interpretation and drafted the manuscript. HG was responsible for the design and statistical consultation. MD performed the statistical analysis. NMD was responsible for conducting the statistical analyses and making the revisions to the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript to be submitted and published.

Funding

No funding was used in this study

Conflicts of interest

None declare.

References

  1. Izadi H, Zarghami A. The study of social and the economical factors on prostitution phenomena in Shiraz at 2010. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development). 2014; 9:227-45.
  2. Kempadoo K, Doezema J. Forced to choose: Beyond the voluntary v. forced prostitution dichotomy. Global sex workers: Routledge; 2018. p. 34-50.
  3. Coy M. Prostitution, harm and gender inequality: Theory, research and policy: Routledge; 2016.
  4. Nzila N, Laga M, Thiam MA, Mayimona K, Edidi B, Van Dyck E, et al. HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases among female prostitutes in Kinshasa. Aids. 1991; 5:715-22. DOI
  5. Farley M, Barkan H. Prostitution, violence, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Women & health. 1998; 27:37-49. DOI
  6. Prior J, Hubbard P, Birch P. Sex worker victimization, modes of working, and location in New South Wales, Australia: a geography of victimization. J Sex Res. 2013; 50:574-86. DOI
  7. Levine P. Prostitution, race and politics: policing venereal disease in the British Empire: Routledge; 2013.
  8. Bisschop P, Kastoryano S, van der Klaauw B. Street prostitution zones and crime. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2017; 9:28-63. DOI
  9. Malery khah Langeroudi Z, Delbarpour Ahmadi S, Esmaeili M. Barriers of condom use among female sex workers in Tehran, a qualitative study. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2014; 12:23-34.
  10. Rotenberg C. Prostitution offences in Canada: Statistical trends. Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. 2016:1.
  11. Conner SP. Prostitution in Paris. 2017.
  12. VARVAIE A, NIAZKHANI M, KOLAKI H. Analysis of economic factors effective on the tending to the street prostitution and social-police solutions of its prevention. 2010.
  13. Sharifi H, Karamouzian M, Baneshi MR, Shokoohi M, Haghdoost A, McFarland W, et al. Population size estimation of female sex workers in Iran: synthesis of methods and results. PloS one. 2017; 12:e0182755. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  14. Madani Ghafrokhi S. Gender Consequences of Social Capital Destruction. Women in Development and Politics (Women's Research). 2004.
  15. Karamouzian M, Foroozanfar Z, Ahmadi A, Haghdoost AA, Vogel J, Zolala F. How sex work becomes an option: Experiences of female sex workers in Kerman, Iran. Cult Health Sex. 2016; 18:58-70. DOI
  16. Dashtaki NM, Askari F, Fararouei M, Ghaem H, Dianati-Nasab M. Sexual Practices and Their Associates in Iranian Female Sex Workers. Sexuality Research Social Policy. 2024;1-7. DOI
  17. Mehmandoost S, Sharifi H, Shokoohi M, Khezri M, Mirzazadeh A, Shahesmaeili A, et al. Sexualized Substance Use among Female Sex Workers in Iran: Findings from a Nationwide Survey. Subst Use Misuse. 2023; 58:298-305. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  18. Mohammadi Dashtaki N, Fararouei M, Askari F, Dianati-Nasab M. Drug use and its related factors among Iranian female sex workers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Substance Use. 2024;1-5. DOI
  19. Roshanfekr P, Madani Qahfarokhi S, Ranjbar M, Nasiri B, Mohammadi MA. Substance Abuse among Young Female Sex Workers in Tehran Metropolitan. Sociol Stud Child Youth. 2019; 10:75-90.
  20. Shrier I, Pang M. Confounding, effect modification and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68:470-4. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  21. Baker LM, Dalla RL, Williamson C. Exiting prostitution: An integrated model. Violence against women. 2010; 16:579-600. DOI | PubMed
  22. Cronley C, Cimino AN, Hohn K, Davis J, Madden E. Entering prostitution in adolescence: History of youth homelessness predicts earlier entry. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2016; 25:893-908. DOI
  23. Ashuri M, Varvayee A. Family and street prostitutes. Iranian Journal of Law. 2010; 1:1-20.
  24. Hernández D. Affording housing at the expense of health: exploring the housing and neighborhood strategies of poor families. J Fam Issues. 2016; 37:921-46. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  25. Sallmann J. Living with stigma: Women’s experiences of prostitution and substance use. Affilia. 2010; 25:146-59. DOI
  26. Whyte MK. Dating, mating, and marriage: Routledge; 2018.DOI
  27. Lösel F, Bender D. Protective Factors Against Crime and Violence in Adolesence. The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. 2017;1-15. DOI
  28. Astrup A, Pedersen CB, Mok PL, Carr MJ, Webb RT. Self-harm risk between adolescence and midlife in people who experienced separation from one or both parents during childhood. J Affect Disord. 2017; 208:582-9. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  29. Clarke RJ, Clarke EA, Roe-Sepowitz D, Fey R. Age at entry into prostitution: Relationship to drug use, race, suicide, education level, childhood abuse, and family experiences. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2012; 22:270-89. DOI
  30. Kramer LA, Berg EC. A survival analysis of timing of entry into prostitution: The differential impact of race, educational level, and childhood/adolescent risk factors. Sociol Inq 2003; 73:511-28.
  31. Cunningham S, Kendall TD. Prostitution, hours, job amenities and education. Rev Econ Househ. 2017; 15:1055-80.
  32. Collins RL, Martino S, Shaw R. Influence of new media on adolescent sexual health: Working Paper WR-761). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Health. 2010.