Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sulaimaniyah General Directorate of Health - Research Department, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq

2 Department of Nursing, College of Health and Medical Technology, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq

3 Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Iraq

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common form of hair loss that significantly affects individuals’ self-esteem,
psychological well-being, and quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of AGA among adults in Sulaimani Governorate, Iraq.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sulaimani Governorate from September 2022 to December 2023. A stratified sampling method was used to select 1,438 participants aged 18 years and older. Data were collected through a researcherdesigned questionnaire and clinical examinations using the Ludwig and Norwood-Hamilton scales. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Pearson’s chi-square test were used for
data analysis.
Results: The study population consisted of 49.7% males (n=715) and 50.3% females (n=723), with mean ages of 32.23±10.04 and 31.46±11.19 years, respectively. Females exhibited a higher incidence of sudden hair loss (27.5%) compared to males (18.3%). Significant risk factors included a family history of hair loss (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.23–1.35, P=0.001) and recent general operations (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.01–1.15, P=0.023). Additionally, the use of flat irons/curling irons (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.10–1.18, P=0.001) and frequent use (>3 times/week) (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35, P=0.002) were associated with increased hair loss.
Conclusion: This study provides important insights into the epidemiology and risk factors of AGA in Sulaimani Governorate, Iraq. The findings underscore the need for targeted prevention and treatment strategies that consider the distinct characteristics of the local population. Further research is warranted to investigate the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to AGA in this region.

Keywords

Introduction

Alopecia, defined as visible hair loss, is a widespread condition that affects individuals globally and has a profound impact on self-esteem, psychological well-being, and overall quality of life. Among the different forms of alopecia, androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type 1 , representing a progressive condition strongly influenced by genetic predisposition and hormonal regulation 2 .

In men, AGA typically presents with a receding hairline and thinning at the vertex, which may eventually progress to partial or complete baldness. In contrast, women generally experience diffuse thinning over the crown, while the frontal hairline is usually preserved. The psychosocial consequences of AGA can be substantial, particularly for women, as hair plays a crucial role in self-image, social identity, and cultural perceptions of attractiveness 3 .

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a highly prevalent condition that affects both men and women with varying degrees of severity. It is estimated that by the age of 50, approximately 50% of men and 25% of women experience some degree of AGA 4 . A strong familial component has been identified, with males being more likely than females to report a family history of alopecia 5 . While some studies indicate that the overall incidence of AGA does not significantly differ between men and women, others suggest a male predominance. Moreover, the prevalence and severity of AGA vary considerably across ethnic and geographic populations, underscoring the complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental influences 8 . Understanding these variations is crucial for developing region-specific strategies to prevent, detect early, and manage AGA.

The pathophysiology of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is complex and multifactorial, involving the interaction of genetic susceptibility, hormonal influences, and environmental factors. Among these, androgens—particularly dihydrotestosterone (DHT)—play a central role in the progressive miniaturization of hair follicles in genetically predisposed individuals 4 . DHT binds to androgen receptors within the dermal papilla cells of hair follicles, triggering molecular changes that shorten the anagen (growth) phase and prolong the telogen (resting) phase of the hair cycle. Over time, this imbalance leads to progressive follicular miniaturization, resulting in thinner, shorter, and less pigmented hair shafts, ultimately culminating in visible hair thinning and patterned hair loss 9 .

Unlike cicatricial alopecia, the pathological process in AGA is characterized by follicular hypoplasia rather than atrophy or complete follicular destruction. Importantly, the dermal papillae—which regulate follicular development and cycling—generally exhibit no consistent structural abnormalities. Genetic predisposition, in combination with androgen production and heightened follicular sensitivity to DHT, constitutes the essential foundation of AGA pathogenesis 10 .

While the prevalence of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) has been extensively investigated in diverse populations worldwide, there is a notable paucity of epidemiological data from the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Given the cultural, genetic, and environmental heterogeneity of this population, understanding the regional epidemiology and associated risk factors of AGA is essential for informing clinical practice and developing targeted prevention and management strategies. Accordingly, this study sought to examine the prevalence, epidemiological characteristics, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical implications of AGA among adults in Sulaimani Governorate, Iraq.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

This study employed a community-based analytical cross-sectional design to assess the prevalence and determinants of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) among adults in Sulaimani Governorate between September 15, 2022, and December 14, 2023.

A stratified sampling method was used to ensure representativeness across geographic districts of the governorate. The sample size (n = 1,438) was calculated assuming a 50% prevalence of AGA, with a precision of 3%, a population size of 2,123,000, a confidence level of 97%, and an alpha value of 0.05. Participants were proportionally selected from each district according to population size, and then randomly chosen within strata to minimize selection bias.

Eligible participants included adult men and women aged 18 years and above who were generally in good health. Individuals with other dermatological conditions affecting the scalp (e.g., alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis, discoid lupus erythematosus) and those under 18 years of age were excluded from the study.

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the research ethics guidelines of the Technical College of Health, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, and the General Directorate of Health, Sulaymaniyah (Approval No: S3214G). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection. Confidentiality and anonymity were strictly maintained, and participation was entirely voluntary, with the option to withdraw at any stage without consequences.

Data Collection

Data were collected using a researcher-designed questionnaire comprising seven sections: (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) medical and health status, (3) hair loss stage and pattern, (4) risk factors, (5) laboratory data, (6) women’s health, and (7) response to treatment.

The reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, which yielded a coefficient of 0.81, indicating high internal consistency. Content validity was established by a panel of five experts, who evaluated the questionnaire for clarity, relevance, and alignment with the study objectives. A pilot study involving 75 participants was conducted to evaluate the reliability, validity, clarity, and feasibility of the questionnaire, confirming that it was suitable for the main study.

In addition to the questionnaire, participants underwent a clinical examination to determine the stage of hair loss. The Ludwig scale was applied for female participants, which classifies female pattern hair loss based on the degree of thinning over the crown 11 . For male participants, the Norwood-Hamilton scale was used, a standardized tool that categorizes male pattern baldness from minimal recession to advanced baldness 12 .

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and frequencies) were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics and to estimate the prevalence of AGA.

Associations between AGA and categorical variables (demographic, lifestyle, and health-related characteristics) were examined using Pearson’s chi-square test, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. To further explore predictors of AGA, binary logistic regression analysis was conducted, generating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each independent variable.

Results

A total of 1,438 participants were enrolled, with an almost equal distribution of males (49.7%, n = 715) and females (50.3%, n = 723). The mean age was 32.23 ± 10.03 years for males and 31.46 ± 11.18 years for females, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.169).

The vast majority of participants were Kurdish (97.6%, n = 1,404), followed by Arabs (1.9%, n = 28) and other nationalities (0.4%, n = 6). Most individuals reported a middle economic status (87.1%, n = 1,253), while 7.4% (n = 106) reported low and 5.5% (n = 79) reported high economic status.

Occupational distribution showed that “Other” professions constituted the largest group (44.3%), followed by health workers (14.2%), housewives (13.0%), employees (11.3%), and teachers (9.1%). In terms of education, the highest proportion was institute graduates (32.1%), followed by university degree holders (28.4%), secondary education (20.0%), primary education (11.3%), illiterate (5.6%), and post-graduates (2.7%).

With respect to marital status, 58.0% were married, 41.2% were single, and 0.8% were divorced. Most participants resided in the city center (49.8%), while 49.0% lived in districts and 1.2% in rural areas.

Table 1 presents the distribution of socio-demographic variables in the studied population.

Variable N %
Sex Male 714 49.7
Female 724 50.3
Address Sulaimani 498 34.6
Chamchama 110 7.6
Darbandikhan 110 7.6
Ranya 250 17.4
Saidsadq 120 8.3
Dukan 100 7.0
Kalar 250 17.4
Nationality Kurdish 1404 97.6
Arabic 28 1.9
Other 6 0.4
Economic status Low 106 7.4
Middle 1253 87.1
High 79 5.5
Job Medical staff 115 8.0
Teacher 131 9.1
Health worker 204 14.2
Employee 163 11.3
Housewife 187 13.0
Other 635 44.3
Education level Illiterate 80 5.6
Primary 162 11.3
Secondary 287 20.0
Institute 461 32.1
University 409 28.4
Post graduated 39 2.7
Marital status Married 834 58.0
Single 593 41.2
Divorcee 11 0.8
Residency City center 716 49.8
Districts 705 49.0
Rural 17 1.2
Table 1. Distribution of Socio-demographic variables in the studied population (n = 1438)

The highest proportion of participants with hair loss was observed in Sulaimani (35.7%), followed by Kalar (19.5%) and Ranya (13.3%). A statistically significant association was found between hair loss and geographic location (p = 0.001).

Regarding residency, the prevalence of hair loss was higher among participants living in city centers (53.4%) compared to those in districts (45.4%) and rural areas (1.2%), with this difference also reaching statistical significance (p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that living in urban areas slightly increased the likelihood of experiencing hair loss (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11–1.24) (Table 2).

Variable Class Hair loss OR CI95% P-value**
Yes No
Address Sulaimani 345 (35.7)* 153 (32.5) 1.12 0.04-0.18 0.001
Chamchama 48 (5) 62 (13.2)
Darbandikhan 71 (7.3) 39 (8.3)
Ranya 129 (13.3) 121 (25.7)
Saidsadq 99 (10.2) 21 (4.5)
Dukan 86 (8.9) 14 (3)
Kalar 189 (19.5) 61 (13)
Single 398 (41.2) 195 (41.1)
Divorcee 8 (0.8) 3 (0.6)
Residency City center 516 (53.4) 200 (42.5) 1.15 1.11-.1.24 0.001
Districts 439 (45.4) 266 (56.5)
Rural 12 (1.2) 5 (1.1)
No 833 (86.1) 392 (83.2)
*Frequency (%), P-value chi-Square
Table 2. The state of hair loss in the participants according to their address and residency (n= 1438)

The study identified significant gender differences in the prevalence and pattern of hair loss (Table 3). Females reported a higher incidence of sudden hair loss (27.5%) compared to males (18.3%), with an odds ratio of 1.25, indicating a statistically significant gender disparity.

Variable Hair loss OR (CI95%) P-value*
Male Female
How rapid was the hair loss Sudden 81 122 (18.3) * 144 (27.5) 1.46 (1.28-1.66) 0.001
Gradual 362 (81.7) 380 (72.5)
Which part of your head has hair loss All over 131 (29.6) 412 (78.6) 1.25 (1.14-1.42) 0.001
Front 186 (42) 49 (9.4)
Hairline 28 (6.3) 28 (5.3)
Crown 73 (16.5) 17 (3.2)
Back/lower 11 (2.5) 16 (3.1)
Other 14 (3.2) 2 (0.4)
*Frequency (%), P-value chi-Square
Table 3. The state of hair loss in the participants according to sex (n= 1438)

In males, hair loss predominantly affected the front of the scalp (42%), followed by diffuse thinning (29.6%) and the crown (16.5%). In contrast, females most commonly exhibited diffuse hair loss (78.6%), with fewer cases affecting the front (9.4%) or hairline (5.3%).

Table 4 highlights the significance of family history and recent general operations as risk factors for hair loss in the studied population. A positive family history of hair loss was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of hair loss occurrence (p = 0.001). Similarly, individuals who had undergone recent general operations exhibited an increased risk of hair loss (p = 0.023).

Variable Class Hair loss OR CI95% P-value*
Yes No
Weight 69.33±11.456 70.05±10.864 - 0.252
Height 168.16±9.558 168.60±9.354 - 0.404
BMI 24.658±6.745 23.914±8.202 - 0.520
Family history of hair loss Yes 591(61.1) 86 (18.3) 1.29 1.23-.135 0.001
No 376 (38.9) 385 (81.7)
Are you actively dieting Yes 151 (15.6) 63 (13.4) - 0.263
No 816 (84.4) 408 (86.6)
If yes, what type of diet No 816 (84.4) 408 (86.6) - 0.248
Low Carbohydrate 56 (5.8) 32 (6.8)
Keto 27 (2.8) 9 (1.9)
Intermittent fasting 17 (1.8) 8 (1.7)
Other 51 (5.3) 14 (3)
Recent general operation Yes 126 (13) 42 (8.9) 1.07 1.01-1.15 0.023
No 841 (87) 429 (91.1)
If yes, Type of anesthesia No 841 (87) 429 (91.1) - 0.070
General anesthesia 92 (9.5) 32 (6.8)
Regional anesthesia 34 (3.5) 10 (2.1)
*P-value T-test and Chi-square
Table 4. Distribution of Risk Factor Hair Loss in the Studied Population (n = 1438)

A significantly higher proportion of individuals with hair loss (19.6%) reported using flat irons or curling irons compared to those without hair loss (11%). The odds ratio (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.10–1.18, p = 0.001) indicates a positive and significant association between the use of these styling tools and hair loss. Among users, a greater percentage of individuals with hair loss (55.3%) used flat irons or curling irons more than three times per week, compared to 27% among those without hair loss. Frequent use (>3 times/week) was also significantly associated with hair loss (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35, p = 0.002). These findings suggest that both the use and frequency of flat irons/curling irons are significant risk factors for hair loss in the studied population.

Among participants, 27.3% of those with hair loss and 25.9% of those without hair loss reported using hair coloring products, most commonly once a week. Henna use was reported by 13.8% of participants with hair loss and 11% without, with the majority applying it on a weekly basis. Hair spray use was similar between groups (11% with hair loss vs. 10.6% without), with an average of 1–3 times per week. Hair gel was used by 26.2% of participants with hair loss and 29.7% without, with most users applying it 1–3 times or more than three times per week. Overall, a higher proportion of individuals with hair loss used hair coloring and gel products than those without, although these differences were not statistically significant (Table 5).

Variable Class Hair loss OR CI95% P-value#
Yes No
Flat ironing curling iron Yes 190 (19.6) 52 (11) 1.09 1.10-1.18 0.001
No 777 (80.4) 419 (89)
How many times/week ≤ 3 85 (44.7) 14 (27) 1.04 1.02-1.35 0.002
> 3 105 (55.3) 38 (73)
* Frequency (%), ** Mean ± SD, # P-value chi-square
Table 5. Flat ironing, curling iron, and fingernail normal in people with and without a history of hair loss in the studied population (n = 1438)

No significant differences were observed between participants with and without hair loss regarding exposure to iron, zinc, or vitamin D. Similarly, the prevalence of oral medication use (15.8% vs. 15.3%) and vitamin or supplement use (23.6% vs. 19.7%) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among supplement users, a higher proportion of individuals with hair loss reported daily intake (65.7% vs. 48.4%). A trend toward significance was noted for vitamin B12 use, with 10.8% of individuals with hair loss reporting use compared to 4.7% without hair loss (Table 6).

Variable Class Hair loss P-value*
Yes No
N (%) N (%)
Hair coloured Yes 264 (27.3) 122 (25.9) 0.574
No 703 (72.7) 349 (74.1)
Hair coloured per week No 703 (72.7) 349 (74.1) 0.348
One 13 (13.1) 10 (15.9)
Two 3 (3) 0
Hana Yes 133 (13.8) 52 (11) 0.149
No 834 (86.2) 419 (89)
Hana per week No 834 (86.2) 419 (89) 0.912
One 2 (0.8) 4 (1.6)
Hair Spray Yes 106 (11) 50 (10.6) 0.843
No 861 (89) 421 (89.4)
Spray per week No 861 (89) 421 (89.4) 0.205
1-3 31 (8.7) 30 (9.8)
3 < 13 (2.3) 2 (0.8)
Gel Yes 253 (26.2) 140 (29.7) 0.155
No 714 (73.8) 331 (70.3)
Gel per week No 714 (73.8) 331 (70.3) 0.133
1-3 101 (10.5) 44 (9.4)
3 < 152 (15.7) 96 (20.3)
*P-value chi-Square
Table 6. Distribution of chemical exposure in people with and without a history of hair loss in the studied population (n = 1438)

Table 7 suggests that hair loss in women may be associated with specific fertility and reproductive health factors, including difficulty conceiving and menopausal status. Women with hair loss reported a significantly higher rate of difficulty conceiving (19.1%) compared to those without hair loss (11.5%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.11, suggesting a lower likelihood of conception difficulties in women without hair loss. The prevalence of menopause was higher among women without hair loss (21%) than those with hair loss (13%), with an OR of 1.13. Rates of hysterectomy and ovary removal were slightly higher in women with hair loss, but these differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, estrogen replacement therapy was marginally more common among women without hair loss (2.5%) compared to those with hair loss (1.9%), with no significant difference observed.

Variable Class Hair loss P-value**
Yes No
Oral medication Yes 153 (15.8) 72 (15.3) 0.527
No 814 (84.2) 399 (84.7)
Vitamins and natural supplements Yes 228 (23.6) 93 (19.7) 0.101
No 739 (76.4) 378 (80.3)
Dosage of vitamins and natural supplements daily 150 (65.7) 45 (48.4) 0.647
weekly 50 (22) 30 (32.3)
Monthly 28 (12.3) 18 (19.3)
Iron Yes 57 (5.9) 20 (4.3) 0.705
No 910 (94.1) 451 (95.7)
Zinc Yes 60 (6.3) 25 (5.4) 0.777
No 907 (93.7) 446 (94.6)
Vitamin D Yes 147 (15.3) 63 (13.4) 0.751
No 820 (84.7) 408 (86.6)
Vitamin B12 Yes 104 (10.8) 22 (4.7) 0.06
No 863 (89.2) 449 (95.3)
*Frequency, **P-value chi-Square
Table 7. Distribution of Chemical exposure in people with and without a history of hair loss, the population of Sulaimani City

Discussion

The study's findings on the epidemiology and assessment of hair loss among adults in Sulaimani Governorate, Iraq, provide valuable insights. The participants' demographic characteristics, including a diverse and representative sample with a nearly equal distribution of males and females, allow for a comprehensive understanding of the population affected by hair loss.

In contrast to the study by Kacar et al., which primarily examined perceived stigma and its relationship with demographic variables 13 , our findings emphasize the direct correlation between demographic factors and the prevalence of hair loss. While stigma is a significant psychological outcome of AGA, understanding the demographic determinants—such as residency, gender, age, and family history—is crucial for elucidating the epidemiological patterns of hair loss in the population.

The significant associations observed between hair loss and certain demographic variables, such as address, residency, and occupation, are consistent with findings from other regions. For instance, a study conducted by Wang et al. in China reported that urban residency was associated with a higher prevalence of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) compared to rural areas, suggesting that environmental factors, such as pollution, stress, and lifestyle differences, may contribute to the increased risk of hair loss in urban populations 14 . Similarly, the higher prevalence of AGA in urban areas within the Sulaimani Governorate could be attributed to these same factors,

The rate of hair loss also varied significantly between the sexes, with a higher proportion of women experiencing sudden hair loss than men. This variable increased the odds of hair loss by 3% (OR = 1.03), highlighting the importance of a tailored approach to hair loss management that accounts for the rapidity and pattern of the condition. Similar findings were reported by Can et al., who observed sex-specific differences in chemotherapy-induced alopecia 15 , noting lower psychological well-being among women compared to men regardless of hair loss severity. Lolli et al. further emphasized that women are more likely to experience diffuse thinning over the crown, whereas men typically present with a receding hairline and vertex balding 16 . This gender-specific pattern of hair loss was also evident in our study, with females exhibiting a higher incidence of diffuse hair loss compared to males.

Additionally, the observed association between family history and the prevalence of hair loss highlights the genetic predisposition underlying AGA. Lee et al. (2023) emphasized the critical role of family history in the development of male pattern hair loss, particularly when AGA is present on both the paternal and maternal sides 17 . Consistent with these findings, our study revealed that individuals with a family history of hair loss were significantly more likely to experience hair loss themselves.

The study identified a significant association between the use of flat irons and curling irons and an increased risk of hair loss. Individuals with a history of hair loss were more likely to have used these heat styling tools, and frequent use (more than three times per week) was also significantly associated with an increased risk of hair loss. These findings suggest that excessive heat exposure from styling tools may negatively affect hair health, causing cuticle damage, protein loss, and weakening of the hair shaft, ultimately leading to breakage and hair loss. Hatsbach de Paula et al. reported that prolonged heat exposure from hair straighteners can cause internal hair damage, particularly in textured hair 18 . However, Olsen et al. found no significant correlation between hair straightener use and extensive central hair loss 19 . Moreover, no association was observed between the age at which hair straightening was first initiated and the pattern of hair loss when comparing individuals with no hair loss (pattern 0) to those with probable central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) patterns 3 and 5.

Based on the data from this study, no significant association was observed between hair loss and the use of hair coloring products, henna, hair spray, or hair gel (p > 0.05). The frequency of use of these products was similar between individuals with and without hair loss. It is essential to note that this study focused solely on the presence or absence of hair loss, rather than its severity or specific types. In contrast, Jusuf reported that hair coloring can damage hair and cause scalp problems 20 , finding a significant relationship between hair coloring, hair damage, and scalp issues.

The results indicate a significant difference in Vitamin B12 supplementation between individuals with and without a history of hair loss, with 10.8% of those with hair loss reporting use of Vitamin B12 supplements. This finding suggests that Vitamin B12 deficiency may contribute to hair loss in this population, although further research is needed to establish a causal relationship and clarify the underlying mechanisms. Assessing Vitamin B12 status and considering supplementation may be valuable in managing hair loss conditions. Trends observed in the intake of other nutrients also warrant further investigation.

In contrast, Almohanna et al. found no significant differences in folate and Vitamin B12 levels between patients with hair loss and control subjects 21 . Additionally, Devjani et al. (2023) reported reduced Vitamin B12 levels in females with AGA treated with ethinyl estradiol and cyproterone acetate 22 . This deficiency led to Vitamin B12-related anxiety, prompting some patients to discontinue treatment. Daily supplementation with 200 µg of Vitamin B12 corrected the deficiency; however, this reduction in Vitamin B12 levels did not adversely affect hair shedding or growth.

The results indicate significant differences in the prevalence of fertility issues and menopausal status between women with and without a history of hair loss. Women with hair loss were more likely to report difficulties in becoming pregnant, whereas women without hair loss were more likely to be menopausal. These findings suggest that reproductive and hormonal factors may play a role in the development of hair loss. The observed associations warrant further investigation to clarify the underlying mechanisms and their potential implications for the management of hair loss. Exploring these relationships in larger, longitudinal studies could provide valuable insights into the interplay between reproductive health and hair loss.

In contrast, Rinaldi et al. reported that hair loss during menopause may present as diffuse thinning or widening of the parting 14 . It is important to note that not all women experience significant hair loss during menopause, and the severity of hair loss can vary considerably among individuals.

Strengths and Limitations

One of the major strengths of this study is its large sample size of 1,438 participants, which is representative of the adult population in Sulaimani Governorate. This enhances the generalizability of the findings to the broader population in the region. The study employed a robust data collection method, combining a detailed, researcher-designed questionnaire with clinical examinations using established scales (Ludwig for females and Norwood-Hamilton for males). This comprehensive approach enabled a thorough assessment of the prevalence and risk factors associated with androgenetic alopecia (AGA).

Additionally, the study addresses a significant gap in the literature by focusing on the prevalence and determinants of AGA in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, a population that has been underrepresented in prior research. The findings provide valuable data that can inform region-specific health strategies and interventions.

However, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences between the identified risk factors and the development of AGA. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal relationships and causality. Some data, particularly lifestyle factors and family history, were self-reported, which may introduce recall bias or social desirability bias. Future research could benefit from incorporating more objective measures where feasible.

While family history was identified as a significant risk factor, this study did not explore specific genetic markers or molecular mechanisms underlying AGA. Future research could address these genetic aspects, potentially through genomic or molecular studies. Finally, the findings are specific to Sulaimani Governorate and may not be directly generalizable to regions with different environmental, cultural, or genetic contexts. Comparative studies across diverse populations would help validate and expand these findings.

Conclusion

This study provides important insights into the epidemiology and risk factors of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) among adults in the Sulaimani Governorate, Iraq. The findings underscore the need for tailored prevention and treatment strategies that consider the unique demographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics of the local population. Further research is warranted to investigate the underlying genetic and environmental factors contributing to AGA in this region.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance provided by the Sulaimaniyah General Directorate of Health's Research Department, which facilitated the data collection process and logistical arrangements. Special thanks are extended to the Department of Nursing, College of Health and Medical Technology at Sulaimani Polytechnic University for their academic and technical support throughout the study. Additionally, the authors appreciate the guidance and contributions from the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, which enriched the research design and analysis. The authors also thank all participants for their voluntary involvement and cooperation, without which this study would not have been possible.

Authors' Contributions

Jwan Jellal Rasheed Shwana is the corresponding author and led the research, with Burhan Tahir Saeed and Fattah Hama Rahim Fattah contributing as co-authors.

Funding

 The research received no financial support for the study, authorship, or publication of the article.

Data Availability

The dataset used in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are not publicly available to ensure the confidentiality of participants’ information.

Informed Consent

 Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in the study.

References

  1. Wolff H, Fischer TW, Blume-Peytavi U. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hair and Scalp Diseases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016; 113(21):377-86. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  2. He H, Xie B, Xie L. Male pattern baldness and incidence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(28):e11379. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  3. Anastassakis K, Anastassakis K. The Psychological Effects of AGA/FPHL2022. 283-99 p.
  4. Varothai S, Bergfeld WF. Androgenetic alopecia: an evidence-based treatment update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2014; 15(3):217-30. DOI | PubMed
  5. Kavak A, Yeşildal N, Parlak AH, Gökdemir G, Aydoğan I, Anul H, et al. Alopecia areata in Turkey: demographic and clinical features. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008; 22(8):977-81. DOI | PubMed
  6. Kim BJ, Kim JY, Eun HC, Kwon OS, Kim MN, Ro BI. Androgenetic alopecia in adolescents: a report of 43 cases. J Dermatol. 2006; 33(10):696-9. DOI | PubMed
  7. Xu F, Sheng YY, Mu ZL, Lou W, Zhou J, Ren YT, et al. Prevalence and types of androgenetic alopecia in Shanghai, China: a community-based study. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 160(3):629-32. DOI | PubMed
  8. Abdin R, Zhang Y, Jimenez JJ. Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia Using PRP to Target Dysregulated Mechanisms and Pathways. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:843127. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  9. Swerdloff RS, Dudley RE, Page ST, Wang C, Salameh WA. Dihydrotestosterone: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Clinical Implications of Elevated Blood Levels. Endocr Rev. 2017; 38(3):220-254. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  10. Miranda BH, Charlesworth MR, Tobin DJ, Sharpe DT, Randall VA. Androgens trigger different growth responses in genetically identical human hair follicles in organ culture that reflect their epigenetic diversity in life. FASEB J. 2018; 32(2):795-806. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  11. Ludwig E. Classification of the types of androgenetic alopecia (common baldness) occurring in the female sex. Br J Dermatol. 1977; 97(3):247-54. DOI | PubMed
  12. Norwood OT. Male pattern baldness: classification and incidence. South Med J. 1975; 68(11):1359-65. DOI | PubMed
  13. Kacar SD, Soyucok E, Bagcioglu E, Ozuguz P, Coskun KS, Asık AH, et al. The Perceived Stigma in Patients with Alopecia and Mental Disorder: A Comparative Study. Int J Trichology. 2016; 8(3):135-40. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  14. Wang TL, Zhou C, Shen YW, Wang XY, Ding XL, Tian S, et al. Prevalence of androgenetic alopecia in China: a community-based study in six cities. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 162(4):843-7. DOI | PubMed
  15. Can G, Demir M, Erol O, Aydiner A. A comparison of men and women&#039;s experiences of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013; 17(3):255-60. DOI | PubMed
  16. Lolli F, Pallotti F, Rossi A, Fortuna MC, Caro G, Lenzi A, et al. Androgenetic alopecia: a review. Endocrine. 2017; 57(1):9-17. DOI | PubMed
  17. Lee SH, Kang H, Lee WS. Association between Family History and Male Androgenetic Alopecia with Female Pattern Hair Loss. Ann Dermatol. 2023; 35(5):348-354. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  18. Hatsbach de Paula JN, Basílio FMA, Mulinari-Brenner FA. Effects of chemical straighteners on the hair shaft and scalp. An Bras Dermatol. 2022; 97(2):193-203. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  19. Olsen EA, Callender V, McMichael A, Sperling L, Anstrom KJ, Shapiro J, et al. Central hair loss in African American women: incidence and potential risk factors. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011; 64(2):245-52. DOI | PubMed
  20. Jusuf NK. The Relationship between Types of Hair Coloring with Hair Damages and Scalp Problems in Medical Students of University Sumatera Utara, Indonesia. International Archives of Medicine. 2016; 9: 69. DOI
  21. Almohanna HM, Ahmed AA, Tsatalis JP, Tosti A. The Role of Vitamins and Minerals in Hair Loss: A Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019; 9(1):51-70. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  22. Devjani S, Ezemma O, Kelley KJ, Stratton E, Senna M. Androgenetic Alopecia: Therapy Update. Drugs. 2023; 83(8):701-715. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]