Seyed Esmaeil Mousavi Haghighi; Ali Pouladi Rishehri; Seyed Asghar Mousavi
Abstract
Background: Family and marital abnormalities are among the risk factors of psychological trauma in family members and threaten the family system, which is the basis of any healthy society. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) and acceptance ...
Read More
Background: Family and marital abnormalities are among the risk factors of psychological trauma in family members and threaten the family system, which is the basis of any healthy society. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on intimacy and marital adjustment among couples applying for divorce.Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study based on a pretestposttest design with a control group. The study population consisted of all married people applying for divorce in Bushehr city, (Iran) in 2021, 45 of whom were selected as the sample through convenience sampling and randomly and equally assigned to three groups (n= 15 per group). The first and second experimental groups received CBCT and ACT (twelve 90-minute sessions for each), respectively. The research instruments included Walker and Thompson’s Intimacy Scale and Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The data were statistically analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis of covariance in SPSS-26.Results: The results showed a significant difference between the experimental groups and the control group in the post test scores of intimacy and marital adjustment (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between CBCT and ACT in improving marital adjustment (P=0.012), whereas these two interventions did not exhibit such a difference in improving intimacy.Conclusion: The study findings suggested that both CBCT and ACT can be used for improving the intimacy between the couples applying for divorce. However, CBCT is more recommended for improving the marital adjustment of such couples because it exhibited more effectiveness than ACT in this regard.
Somayeh Panahpouri; Sara Arshi
Abstract
Background: One of the most stressful experiences for any family is managing a child with a disability, disorder, or chronic illness. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based therapy on psychological flexibility and resilience among mothers with ...
Read More
Background: One of the most stressful experiences for any family is managing a child with a disability, disorder, or chronic illness. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based therapy on psychological flexibility and resilience among mothers with autistic children in Shiraz.Methods: This is a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study with a control group. The statistical population of the present study included mothers with autistic children referring to the autism community in Shiraz city at 1398. According to the semiexperimental design and the criteria for research, a sample of 36 patients (each group of 18) was selected randomly. Samples were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. The experimental group received 8 sessions of “acceptance and commitment therapy”. The instrument for collecting information included the Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire (CFI) and Connor & Davidson Resilience Questionnaire. Data were analyzed through SPSS software using covariance.Results: The results showed that Commitment-based Therapy is effective in increasing the mental flexibility and resilience of mothers of children with autism (P=0.001).Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that acceptance and commitment therapy is effective in improving the mental health of mothers with childhood autism.
Mahtab Ardeshirzadeh; Saeed Bakhtiarpour; Rezvan Homaei; Zahra Eftekhar Saadi
Abstract
Background: Divorce, as an issue, can contribute to the development of a wide range of problems and consequences and frequently lead to an increased risk of social problems at both individual and social levels. The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy (CFT) ...
Read More
Background: Divorce, as an issue, can contribute to the development of a wide range of problems and consequences and frequently lead to an increased risk of social problems at both individual and social levels. The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on post-divorce adjustment in divorced women referred to the counseling center in Ahvaz city in 2019.
Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test, posttest, and follow-up design and a control group. Using convenience sampling, we selected 45 divorced women willing to participate in the study. Then, we randomly divided them into two experimental groups (compassion-focused therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy) and a control group (n = 15 per group). The research instrument included the Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale (FDAS). The first intervention program consisted of eight 60-minute sessions of compassion-focused therapy and the second intervention program consisted of ten 90-minute sessions of acceptance and commitment therapy.
Results: The results showed that both compassion-focused therapy (CFT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) were effective in increasing post-divorce adjustment in divorced women (p<0.01). There was no significant difference between the CFT and ACT on post-divorce adjustment in this group of women (p>0.05). These results continued until the follow-up stage.
Conclusion: According to research findings, both CFT and ACT were efficient therapies in increasing post-divorce adjustment in divorced women. Thus, both approaches can strengthen treatment interventions to increase adjustment in divorced women
