Document Type : Letter to Editor

Authors

1 Department of General Courses, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran

3 Department of English, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

10.30476/jhsss.2023.98412.1748

Abstract

This article has no abstract.

Highlights

Mostafa Amiri (Google Scholar)

Nasrin Shokrpour (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. Tennant JP, Ross-Hellauer T. The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research integrity and peer review. 2020;5(1):2-14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1.
  2. Shomoossi N, Shomoossi Z, Rad M. Stressing the need for the pool of trained peer reviewers vs. authors’ suggested reviewers. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2023;15(48):78-79.
  3. Koushan M, Pejhan A, Shomoossi N, Shomoossi A. Ethical considerations in publishing medical articles in Iranian journals. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis. 2014; 31(2):105-11. doi: 2478/afmnai-2014-0012.
  4. Amiri M, Alami A, Matlabi M, Shomoossi N. Error analysis of nonnative authors’ publications in health-care journals: A descriptive study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021; 10. doi: 4103/jehp.jehp_793_20.
  5. Shomoossi N. Collaboration of Translators with Medical Authors: A Qualitative Enquiry into Writing Articles in English/Saradnja Izmedu Prevodilaca I Autora Medicinskih Radova: Kvalitativno Istrazivanje U Pisanju Radova Na Engleskom Jeziku. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis. 2013; 30(1):45. doi: 2478/v10283-012-0035-1.
  6. Swales JM, Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings: Cambridge university press; 1990. doi: 4236/ce.2020.1111174.
  7. Peacock M. Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System. 2002; 30(4):479-97. doi: 1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7